Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
  3. Article

Models in search of a brain

  • Published: June 2007
  • Volume 7, pages 90–108, (2007)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Image Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Models in search of a brain
Download PDF
  • Bradley C. Love1 &
  • Todd M. Gureckis2 
  • 1357 Accesses

  • 94 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Mental localization efforts tend to stress the where more than the what. We argue that the proper targets for localization are well-specified cognitive models. We make this case by relating an existing cognitive model of category learning to a learning circuit involving the hippocampus, perirhinal, and prefrontal cortices. Results from groups varying in function along this circuit (e.g., infants, amnesics, and older adults) are successfully simulated by reducing the model’s ability to form new clusters in response to surprising events, such as an error in supervised learning or an unfamiliar stimulus in unsupervised learning. Clusters in the model are akin to conjunctive codes that are rooted in an episodic experience (the surprising event) yet can develop to resemble abstract codes as they are updated by subsequent experiences. Thus, the model holds that the line separating episodic and semantic information can become blurred. Dissociations (categorization vs. recognition) are explained in terms of cluster recruitment demands.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Image

Decoding reappraisal and suppression from neural circuits: A combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning approach

Article Open access 28 March 2023
Image

Knowledge acquisition is governed by striatal prediction errors

Article Open access 26 April 2018
Image

A generalized reinforcement learning based deep neural network agent model for diverse cognitive constructs

Article Open access 12 April 2023

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Episodic Memory
  • Learning and Memory
  • Mathematical Models of Cognitive Processes and Neural Networks

References

  • Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., Qin, Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). The relationship of three cortical regions to an information-processing model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 637–653.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. C., Ochsner, K. N., Kuhl, B., Cooper, J., Robertson, E., Gabrieli, S. W., et al. (2004). Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science, 303, 232–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2001). The neurobiology of category learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 204–210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Noble, S., Filoteo, J. V., Waldron, E. M., & Ell, S. W. (2003). Category learning deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychology, 17, 115–124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W., Huttenlocher, J., & Lamberts, K. (1998). Basing categorization on individuals and events. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 203–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benes, F. M. (1994). Development of the corticolimbic system. In G. Dawson & K. W. Fisher (Eds.), Human behavior and the developing brain (pp. 176–206). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozoki, A., Grossman, M., & Smith, E. E. (2006). Can patients with Alzheimer’s disease learn a category implicitly? Neuropsychologia, 44, 816–827.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J. B., Zhao, Z., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Making memories: Brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science, 281, 1185–1187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. P. (2001). Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 51–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butters, M. A., Becker, J. T., Nebes, R. D., Zmuda, M. D., Mulsant, B. H., Pollock, B. G., & Reynolds, C. F. (2000). Changes in cognitive functioning following treatment of late-life depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 1949–1954.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1993). Normal and amnesic learning, recognition and memory by a neural model of cortico-hippocampal interactions. Trends in Neurosciences, 16, 131–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, L. J., & Bauer, P. J. (2001). The dawning of a past: The emergence of long-term explicit memory in infancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 726–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chugani, H. T., Phelps, M. E., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1987). Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Annals of Neurology, 22, 487–497.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I. L. (1994). An artificial neural network analogue of learning in autism. Biological Psychiatry, 36, 5–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, P. D., & Flood, D. G. (1987). Neuron numbers and dendritic extent in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging, 8, 521–545.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Convit, A., de Leon, M. J., Tarshish, C., de Santi, S., Kluger, A., Rusinek, H., & George, A. (1995). Hippocampal volume losses in minimally impaired elderly. Lancet, 345, 266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daselaar, S. M., Fleck, M. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobes: Recollection, familiarity, and novelty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 1902–1911.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davachi, L., Mitchell, J. P., & Wagner, A. D. (2003). Multiple routes to memory: Distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 2157–2162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. S. R., & Glisky, E. L. (2002). Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, M., Mishkin, M., Baldeweg, T., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (2006). Human memory development and its dysfunction after early hippocampal injury. Trends in Neurosciences, 29, 374–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., Churchland, A., Cruess, L., & Kirkham, N. Z. (1999). Early developments in the ability to understand the relation between stimulus and reward. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1507–1517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, J. J., Mayes, A. R., MacDonald, C., & Hunkin, N. M. (2002). Temporal order memory in patients with Korsakoff ’s syndrome and medial temporal amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 853–861.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dywan, J., & Jacoby, L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: Differences in susceptibility to false fame. Psychology & Aging, 5, 379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, H. (1999). Conscious awareness, memory, and the hippocampus. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 775–776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, H. (2000). A cortical-hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 41–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, L. L., Knowlton, B. J., Furmanski, C. S., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Engel, S. A. (2000). Remembering episodes: A selective role for the hippocampus during retrieval. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1149–1152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P. S., Perfilieva, E., Björk-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A.-M., Nordborg, C., Peterson, D. A., & Gage, F. H. (1998). Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nature Medicine, 4, 1313–1317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanselow, M. S. (1999). Learning theory and neuropsychology: Configuring their disparate elements in the hippocampus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 275–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (2001). Building episodic connections: Changes in episodic priming with age and dementia. Neuropsychology, 15, 626–637.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. (2000). Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning. Nature, 407, 630–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filoteo, J. V., & Maddox, W. T. (2004). A quantitative model-based approach to examining aging effects on information-integration category learning. Psychology & Aging, 19, 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, D. G., & Coleman, P. D. (1988). Neuron numbers and sizes in aging brains: Comparisons of humans, monkeys, and rodent data. Neurobiology of Aging, 9, 453–463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, S. I. (1912). New phrenology. Science, 35, 321–328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli, J. D. E., Brewer, J. B., Desmond, J. E., & Glover, G. H. (1997). Separate neural bases of two fundamental memory processes in the human medial temporal lobe. Science, 276, 264–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory. Hippocampus, 3, 491–516.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A., & Myers, C. (2001). Gateway to memory: An introduction to neural network modeling of the hippocampus in learning and memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. A., Oliver, L. M., & Myers, C. E. (1996). Late-training amnesic deficits in probabilistic category learning: A neurocomputational analysis. Learning & Memory, 3, 326–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff, M., & Sweeney, J. A. (1989). Cognitive impairments in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 17, 105–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golomb, J., Kluger, A., de Leon, M. J., Ferris, S., Convit, A., Mittelman, M., et al. (1994). Hippocampal formation size in normal human aging: A correlate of delayed secondary memory performance. Learning & Memory, 1, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, C. L., McIntosh, A. R., Horwitz, B., Maisog, J. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Mentis, M. J., et al. (1995). Age-related reductions in human recognition memory due to impaired encoding. Science, 269, 218–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, T., Lehnertz, K., Heinze, H. J., Helmstaedter, C., & Elger, C. E. (1998). Verbal novelty detection within the human hippocampus proper. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 3193–3197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gureckis, T., & Love, B. C. (2002). Who says models can only do what you tell them? Unsupervised category learning data, fits, and predictions. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 399–404). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gureckis, T., & Love, B. C. (2003). Towards a unified account of supervised and unsupervised learning. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 15, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gureckis, T., & Love, B. C. (2004). Common mechanisms in infant and adult category learning. Infancy, 5, 173–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Separating habit and recollection in young and older adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology & Aging, 14, 122–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, R. K. (1981). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T. M. (1982). Visual abstraction processes in young and old adults. Developmental Psychology, 18, 473–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T. M., Pullen, S. M., & McGee, K. A. (1996). Acquisition of prototype-based information about social groups in adulthood. Psychology & Aging, 11, 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T. M., & Slaughter, S. J. (1986). Aging effects on prototype abstraction and concept identification. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 214–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hockley, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1321–1330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdstock, J. S., Mayes, A. R., Cezayirli, E., Isaac, C. L., Aggleton, J. P., & Roberts, N. (2000). A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Neuropsychologia, 38, 410–425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. H. (2003). Development of human brain functions. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1312–1316.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kéri, S. (2003). The cognitive neuroscience of category learning. Brain Research Reviews, 43, 85–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, B. A., Wagner, A. D., Maril, A., & Stern, C. E. (2000). Prefrontal-temporal circuitry for episodic encoding and subsequent memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6137–6180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, L. G., & Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype formation in autism. Development & Psychopathology, 13, 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. T. (1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383, 256–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747–1749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmann, J. J., Kammradt, G., Krauthausen, I., Sauer, B., & Wingert, F. (1986). Growth of the hippocampal formation in man. Bibliotheca Anatomica, 28, 27–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, N. E. A., Knight, R. T., Metcalfe, J., Wolf, E. S., & Tulving, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 176–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landfield, P. W., Baskin, R. K., & Pitler, T. A. (1981). Brain aging correlates: Retardation by hormonal-pharmacological treatments. Science, 214, 581–584.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2005). Aging neuromodulation impairs associative binding: A neurocomputational account. Psychological Science, 16, 445–450.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1988). Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C. (2002a, November). Aging effects in category learning. Paper presented for the Mind, Brain, and Behavior Forum Series, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C. (2002b). Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 829–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C. (2003, September). Infants, amnesiacs, and the MTL. Paper presented at the J. S. McDonnell Foundation Cognitive Neuroscience of Category Learning Meeting, New York.

  • Love, B. C. (2005). Environment and goals jointly direct category acquisition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). The hippocampus: Where a cognitive model meets cognitive neuroscience. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1589). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., & Gureckis, T. M. (2005). Modeling learning under the influence of culture. In W. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 229–248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., Gureckis, T. M., & Worchel, J. (2007). Category learning and aging: No exception is the rule. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Love, B. C., Markman, A. B., & Yamauchi, T. (2000). Modeling classification and inference learning. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 136–141). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., & Medin, D. L. (1998a). Modeling item and category learning. In S. J. Derry & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 639–644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., & Medin, D. L. (1998b). SUSTAIN: A model of human category learning. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 671–676). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of human category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lupien, S. L., de Leon, M., de Santi, S., Convit, A., Tarshish, C., Nair, N. P. V., et al. (1998). Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 69–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 4398–4403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangels, J. A. (1997). Strategic processing and memory for temporal order in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology, 11, 207–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, A. R., Isaac, C. L., Holdstock, J. S., Hunkin, N. M., Montaldi, D., Downes, J. J., et al. (2001). Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 97–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J., McNaughton, B., & O’Reilly, R. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, B. S., Weiss, J. M., & Schwartz, L. S. (1968). Selective retention of corticosterone by limbic structures in rat brain. Nature, 220, 911–912.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, J. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (1987). Age differences in memory for item and source information. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 175–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merzenich, M. M., & Sameshima, K. (1993). Cortical plasticity and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 3, 187–196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. (2000). fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 197–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montaldi, D., Spencer, T., Roberts, N., & Mayes, A. (2006). The neural system that mediates familiarity memory. Hippocampus, 16, 504–520.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1170–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 826–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. A. (1995). The ontogeny of human memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Developmental Psychology, 31, 723–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, K. A., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary learning systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611–646.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Ruleplus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. F. (1998). Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals. Psychological Science, 9, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmeri, T. J., & Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. Psychological Science, 10, 526–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A., Wilding, E. L., & Akerman, C. (1998). The von Restorff effect in visual object recognition memory in humans and monkeys: The role of frontal/perirhinal interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 691–703.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack, R. A., Clark, J., Pare-Blagoev, E. J., Shohamy, D., Creso Moyano, J., Myers, C., & Gluck, M. A. (2001). Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature, 414, 546–550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neurosciences, 17, 75–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, C., & Knight, R. T. (2003). Prefrontal cortex and episodic memory: Integrating findings from neuropsychology and event-related functional neuroimaging. In A. Parker, E. L. Wilding, & T. J. Bussey (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of memory: Encoding and retrieval (pp. 83–99). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 193–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranganath, C., Yonelinas, A. P., Cohen, M. X., Dy, C. J., Tom, S. M., & D’Esposito, M. (2004). Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 42, 2–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raz, N. (2000). Aging of the brain and its impact on cognitive performance: Integration of structural and functional findings. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–90). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, P. J., Stark, C. E. L., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Cortical areas supporting category learning identified using functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 747–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. M., Squire, L. R., Patalano, A. L., Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Learning about categories that are defined by object-like stimuli despite impaired declarative memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 411–419.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblences: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Y., & Love, B. C. (2004). Schematic influences on category learning and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 33, 534–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapolsky, R. M., Krey, L. C., & McEwen, B. S. (1986). The neuroendocrinology of stress and aging: The glucocorticoid cascade hypothesis. Endocrine Reviews, 7, 284–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Save, E., Poucet, B., Foreman, N., & Buhot, M.-C. (1992). Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 447–456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20, 185–195.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmajuk, N., & DiCarlo, J. (1992). Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 99, 268–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, L. L., & Steinmetz, J. E. (1990). Acquisition of classically conditioned-related activity in the hippocampus is affected by lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 681–692.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seress, L., & Mrzljak, L. (1992). Postnatal development of mossy cells in the human dentate gyrus: A light microscopic Golgi study. Hippocampus, 2, 127–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shors, T. J., Miesegaes, G., Beylin, A., Zhao, M., Rydel, T., & Gould, E. (2001). Neurogenesis in the adult is involved in the formation of trace memories. Nature, 410, 372–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D. (2002). Exemplar theory’s predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed. Psychological Science, 13, 437–442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (2001). Journey to the center of the category: The dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 984–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology & Aging, 10, 527–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, C. E. L., Bayley, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (2002). Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarity impaired following damage to the hippocampal region. Learning & Cognition, 9, 238–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. E., Corkin, S., Gonzalez, R. G., Guimaraes, A. R., Baker, J. R., Jennings, P. J., et al. (1996). The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 8660–8665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, R. J., McDonald, R. J., Hill, C. R., & Rudy, J. W. (1989). Damage to the hippocampal formation in rats selectively impairs the ability to learn cue relationships. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 52, 331–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titov, N., & Knight, R. G. (1997). Adult age differences in controlled and automatic memory processing. Psychology & Aging, 12, 565–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, H., Christie, B. R., Sejnowski, T. J., & Gage, F. H. (1999). Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 13427–13431.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Praag, H., Schinder, A. F., Christie, B. R., Toni, N., Palmer, T. D., & Gage, F. H. (2002). Functional neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Nature, 415, 1030–1034.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W., & Mishkin, M. (1997). Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science, 277, 376–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, H., Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999). Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1142–1148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, S., Yanike, M., Frank, L. M., Smith, A. C., Brown, E. N., & Suzuki, W. A. (2003). Single neurons in the monkey hippocampus and learning of new associations. Science, 300, 1578–1581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wixted, J. T. (2005). A theory about why we forget what we once knew. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I. [G.], Lazzara, M. [M.], & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recognition and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remeber-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12, 323–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Quamme, J. R., Lazzara, M. M., Sauvé, M-J., Widaman, K. F., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1236–1241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. H., Sahakian, B. J., Robbins, T. W., & Cowen, P. J. (1999). The effects of chronic administration of hydrocortisone on cognitive function in normal male volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 145, 260–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Younger, B., & Cohen, L. B. (1986). Developmental change in infants’ perception of correlations among attributes. Child Development, 57, 803–815.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, S. R. (2004). Is categorization performance really intact in amnesia? A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1048–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaki, S. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Jessup, N. M., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2003). Categorization and recognition performance of a memoryimpaired group: Evidence for single-system models. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 394–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeineh, M. M., Engel, S. A., Thompson, P. M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2003). Dynamics of the hippocampus during encoding and retrieval of face-name pairs. Science, 299, 577–580.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Texas, 1 University Station, A8000, Austin, TX, 78712-0187

    Bradley C. Love

  2. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

    Todd M. Gureckis

Authors
  1. Bradley C. Love
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Todd M. Gureckis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley C. Love.

Additional information

This work was supported by AFOSR Grant FA9550-04-1-0226, ARL Grant W911NF-07-2-0023, and NSF CAREER Grant 0349101 to B.C.L.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Love, B.C., Gureckis, T.M. Models in search of a brain. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7, 90–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.2.90

Download citation

  • Received: 04 November 2005

  • Accepted: 04 October 2006

  • Issue date: June 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.2.90

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Medial Temporal Lobe
  • Hippocampal Function
  • Amnesic Patient
  • Conjunctive Information
  • Perirhinal Cortex

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

104.23.243.59

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature

Advertisement
Advertisement