Skip to content

[WIP] bpo-35206: Add new experimental _Py_CAPI2 API#10443

Closed
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
vstinner:capi2
Closed

[WIP] bpo-35206: Add new experimental _Py_CAPI2 API#10443
vstinner wants to merge 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
vstinner:capi2

Conversation

@vstinner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vstinner vstinner commented Nov 10, 2018

Add a new experimental "_Py_CAPI2" API: opt-in which doesn't leak
implementation details and replace macros with function calls. The
defined is called "_Py_CAPI2" and not "Py_CAPI2" because it must not
be used at this stage. The new API is experiment and can be removed
anytime.

With this API, PyTuple_GET_ITEM() macro becomes a function call and
the implementation uses assertions to check if the first argument is
a tuple and that the index is valid. It should help to investigate
bugs when Python is compiled in debug mode.

https://bugs.python.org/issue35206

Add a new experimental "_Py_CAPI2" API: opt-in which doesn't leak
implementation details and replace macros with function calls. The
defined is called "_Py_CAPI2" and not "Py_CAPI2" because it must not
be used at this stage. The new API is experiment and can be removed
anytime.

With this API, PyTuple_GET_ITEM() macro becomes a function call and
the implementation uses assertions to check if the first argument is
a tuple and that the index is valid. It should help to investigate
bugs when Python is compiled in debug mode.
@vstinner vstinner changed the title bpo-35206: Add new experimental _Py_CAPI2 API [WIP] bpo-35206: Add new experimental _Py_CAPI2 API Nov 10, 2018
@vstinner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

According to discussions on python-dev, a PEP will be needed first. Moreover, I prefer to make some progress on https://bugs.python.org/issue35134 before. I close the PR.

@vstinner vstinner closed this Nov 22, 2018
@vstinner vstinner deleted the capi2 branch November 22, 2018 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants