- Comparison: EF Core vs Entity Framework Extensions
- Operation: Bulk SaveChanges
- EF Version: EF Core 9.x
- Benchmarks executed with BenchmarkDotNet (25 iterations, 1 warmup).
- Results may vary depending on hardware, configuration, and dataset size.
- Connection strings are defined in
appsettings.json.
Description:
This chart shows Bulk SaveChanges benchmarks on SQL Server, including plain SaveChanges and SaveChanges with graph.
Description:
This chart shows Bulk SaveChanges benchmarks on PostgreSQL, including plain SaveChanges and SaveChanges with graph.
Description:
This chart shows Bulk SaveChanges benchmarks on MySQL, including plain SaveChanges and SaveChanges with graph.
Description:
This chart shows Bulk SaveChanges benchmarks on MariaDB, including plain SaveChanges and SaveChanges with graph.
Description:
This chart shows Bulk SaveChanges benchmarks on Oracle, including plain SaveChanges and SaveChanges with graph.
Description:
This chart shows Bulk SaveChanges benchmarks on SQLite, including plain SaveChanges and SaveChanges with graph.
Across all providers, Bulk SaveChanges with Entity Framework Extensions consistently outperforms EF Core:
- Performance: EF Extensions cuts SaveChanges execution time dramatically, especially when handling large entity graphs.
- Scalability: By batching changes efficiently, Bulk SaveChanges reduces overhead and boosts performance for high-volume applications.
For applications where SaveChanges performance is a bottleneck, EF Extensions provides reliable speed and scalability across every major database provider.
