×
all 62 comments

[–]RepostSleuthBot[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Looks like a repost. I've seen this image 2 times.

First Seen Here on 2025-09-07 86.72% match. Last Seen Here on 2025-09-10 79.3% match

View Search On repostsleuth.com


Scope: This Sub | Target Percent: 75% | Max Age: None | Searched Images: 1,098,813,021 | Search Time: 0.41231s

[–]rawr_im_a_nice_bear 783 points784 points  (16 children)

"If you've done everything well, no one will know you've done anything at all"

[–]JocoLabs 159 points160 points  (5 children)

I put in minor bugs that look critical so i can fix them during demos and look like a rockstar. AMA.

More from r/ProgrammerHumor

  Hide

Comments, continued...

[–]krexelapp 42 points43 points  (2 children)

worked on first try. i’m terrified.

[–]RandomDigga_9087 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I am also scared brother, either amazing or something terrible gonna happen!

[–]WavingNoBanners 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your boss has already taken this into account for all future sprint-planning estimates.

[–]bryden_cruz[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Honestly it's a great excitement seeing your feauture working well

[–]patmax17 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There's also "I wrote this and it works. Hm... I wonder if I did something wrong?"

[–]meo_mun 23 points24 points  (0 children)

QA seeing features work as intended

Image

[–]JacobStyle 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Needs a panel of angry executives seeing the feature work as expected

[–]Grade_appeal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was actually thinking it needs a panel of angry QA but executives work too 😂!

[–]SlimJohnson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The best is when you're demoing and one executive who was not involved in the previous meetings in earlier sprints is getting angry about why it was designed this way because "We need xyz" instead, and the other executives are arguing with them about how "No, we actually need abc" and you're just sitting there quietly waiting like some goober sharing your screen.

[–]Upstairs-Ad-7962 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That moment when you execute that function that you have been working on for three days and the right number comes back...

But then you think about the time it took to make this singular function and and only for ot to give you that one number. So you overthink your life choices and get like real depressed for a few days, before working on another function...

[–]Kinperor 6 points7 points  (0 children)

One time I deployed a feature that had me going like "excited bench-full of lads", but my users were "bored bench-full of lads". (cut down a 40+ sec & multiple inputs workflow, to single-click 3 sec workflow)

I had the opposite another time, deployed a very small QoL improvement to the tool, user declared boundless romantic love. (program now automatically filled a field, removing one copy+paste operation)

There's no rhyme or reason to users.

[–]namotous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Clients realize now they’d have to pay loll

[–]Standard_Ocelot8564 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The greatest joy: when I just silently work ❤️

[–]Grade_appeal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Needs a panel of angry/disappointed/suspicious QA too.

[–]ohdogwhatdone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those guys must be in their late 50s or mid 60s by now.

[–]MundaneSugar4679 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Users seeing it work: mild satisfaction
Developers seeing it work: 'This is the greatest day of my life and I'm scared'

[–]vljukap98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But by whose expectations, the user's, the manager's, the tester's or the developer's?

[–]dbforge_dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Works as expected” is honestly a higher tier emotion than happiness.

[–]headedbranch225 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this is how I felt when seeing people implent the option for Unix sockets and TCP sockets and being interchangeable until I had to implement it myself

[–]Wachtwoord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happens everywhere. When you buy groceries, you don't celebrate all the features of the system that were needed to get the food there

[–]United-Feature-4566 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once it starts working never touch it again 😭😭

[–]turkishhousefan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Product damager realising they're not getting what they thought they asked for (they refused to define requirements).

Image

[–]thecashblaster 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this meme always gets me because the 3 dudes to the left have different clothing and yellow shirt even has a different haircut in the bottom panel

[–]ShinGouki73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Developer seeing user use the feature as expected"

[–]mrg1957 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more exciting when you do it in production.

[–]Agreeable_Mind7977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hah so true

[–]SubjectMountain6195 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about bugs as a feature?

[–]Extension-Shape9930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, that hits close to home! What's your go-to fix for bugs like that?

[–]HolyElephantMG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Users expect it to succeed

Devs have watched it fail

[–]kishaloy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And the first group has no idea about the pain, tears and blood behind the features. Each one has a tragic story to tell.

[–]No_Pension_4762 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its really out here bro

[–]GlitteringLaw3215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

too real, i just rage-quit my terminal for the third time today