Skip to content

Update Vec::retain_unstable docs to say that this method is generally faster than Vec::retain_mut - #165448

Open
asder8215 wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
asder8215:vec_retain_unstable_docs
Open

asder8215 wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
asder8215:vec_retain_unstable_docs

Conversation

@asder8215

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Per our conversation in #164155 (comment)

Let me know if I should adjust the wording of the doc update.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@rustbot rustbot added A-slice-vec Area: `[T]` and `Vec<T>` S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 4, 2026
@asder8215 asder8215 changed the title Update Vec::retain_unstable docs to say that this method is generally faster than Vec::retain_mut Update Vec::retain_unstable docs to say that this method is generally faster than Vec::retain_mut Nov 4, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-slice-vec Area: `[T]` and `Vec<T>` S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants