~200,000 Ethereum contracts could be affected by the upcoming Glamsterdam gas adjustments.
EIP-8037 increases the base gas for contract creation from 32,000 to 183,600. If a protocol hardcodes the gas forwarded to external calls, those transactions will start reverting on
Dear @ethereum - please don't break the chain.
It does look like Glamsterdam in the current form would lead to another emergency hard fork back, with a lot of drama.
I am sure, it can be made without breaking immutable contracts which hold funds
i don't care how much research went into it, Glamsterdam in its current form is _not_ CROPS and also idgaf if anyone thinks i'm too late here, until it's activated on mainnet it's not too late. core devs have not done proper analysis over the last 1.5 years and i'm not gonna push
Can an old KYC approval reopen payouts?
A customer passes verification. A newer review restricts access. Then the old approval gets retried. If the last webhook to arrive wins, the payout gate can reopen.
Everyone who forced their protocol into a corporate buyback model via "fee-burn" mechanics is hitting a wall right now.
It was always a lazy valuation proxy. The second L2s scale and base fees drop, the whole narrative falls apart and your token utility crumbles.
Like
Expanding on why I believe "ETH as store of value (SoV)" makes much more sense to focus on than "ETH as fee-burning token".
Three primary reasons:
1. ETH as fee-burning token never was as strong as it seemed
2. Optimizing for ETH as fee-burning token would demand Ethereum and
The wallet paid. Why is checkout still waiting?
A source transaction can succeed while the merchant is still unpaid. What your checkout does next decides whether the customer waits, gets a refund, or pays twice.