gh-124694: Document missing ctxkwargs argument in ThreadPoolExecutor#134321
gh-124694: Document missing ctxkwargs argument in ThreadPoolExecutor#134321donbarbos wants to merge 8 commits intopython:mainfrom
Conversation
|
cc @picnixz |
picnixz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know if the parameters are meant to be public but the signature indeed needs to be correct for possible subclassing.
However, prepare_context is not documented so we can't even know how to use them. So we need to also document this at the same time.
And maybe I'm missing something but this is what the class method cpython/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py Lines 157 to 187 in 5ab66a8 |
in this case, we should wait for Eric's feedback. I'm away until Saturday so I won't be able to reply in the meantime. |
|
Thanks everyone for suggestions, now it looks complete |
| pending jobs will raise a :exc:`~concurrent.futures.thread.BrokenThreadPool`, | ||
| as well as any attempt to submit more jobs to the pool. | ||
|
|
||
| *ctxkwargs* is a mapping of additional keyword arguments passed to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ctxkwargs parameter is special -- it does not correspond to a single argument. I am not even sure that it should be documented, since it is only purpose is to be able to pass shared to prepare_context() in InterpreterPoolExecutor(). It may be an implementation detail, in which case I am not sure that it should be documented.
If we still document this, I would write something like "Any addition keyword arguments are passed to prepare_context()." And updated the docstring correspondingly.
based: #129669 (comment)
needs backport only to
3.14📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--134321.org.readthedocs.build/en/134321/library/concurrent.futures.html