bpo-1635741: port pickle to multi-phase init (PEP 489)#23188
bpo-1635741: port pickle to multi-phase init (PEP 489)#23188koubaa wants to merge 3 commits intopython:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@vstinner There are more types to convert to heap types. Even so I think these changes are too much and they should be staged in multiple PRs. I'm wondering how you think I should go about dividing it. |
koubaa
force-pushed
the
bpo-1635741-pickle
branch
from
711f040 to
72614d6
Compare
|
This PR is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days |
|
https://bugs.python.org/issue1635741 is closed. What is the status of this PR? |
|
The change is still relevant, but should use a new issue number. Moreover, the SC asked to put the conversion of static types to heap types on hold. @encukou and @erlend-aasland wrote https://peps.python.org/pep-0687/ which may unblock the situation but it's still a draft. |
|
@koubaa, PEP 687 was accepted. Are you going to follow up this PR? |
|
@erlend-aasland I'd love to - but I doubt I will get time in the near term. Others could use my PRs as a reference in case they find it useful towards doing pep 687 |
All right, I'll pick it up. Thanks for all your work on isolating extension modules. |
|
I'm closing this in order to split it up into multiple PRs. |
7 participants
https://bugs.python.org/issue1635741