AI hype is real — 81% of software teams are using AI in their testing workflows. 📈
That’s just one of the things we learned when we surveyed 625 software developers and engineering leaders to learn about their test automation practices. 🧵
In QA, visible test failures are actually the safest thing that can happen.
A green checkmark only means something when you know how it got there.
hubs.ly/Q042Zprd0
Self-healing in QA sounds great…
until you realize you have no idea what was changed.
Self-healing should save you time, not hide regressions.
If the tool can’t show you exactly what was healed, it isn’t helping.
hubs.ly/Q042Zpf00
40 minutes from meeting → production-ready code.
We documented the exact AI-assisted workflow our team used to build a new architecture feature — including the moment a human had to override the AI.
Worth a read 👇
hubs.ly/Q043DnDk0#SoftwareTesting#AI#DevTools
Some AI for QA tools brag about how many tests they can generate.
Hundreds!
Thousands!
Entire suites written in minutes!
Here’s the part they don’t mention: Most of those tests don’t matter.
Transparency matters: hubs.ly/Q042Zpjt0