I found that Tools/freeze doesn't get tested.  It has a "test" directory but it's more of a rudimentary sanity check that must be run manually.  Since the tool isn't tested through our test suite, there's a high likelihood it can get broken without anyone realizing it.  The risk has increased with recent changes to frozen modules.  So such tests would be valuable.

The tool requires that Python be installed.  In the context of our test suite, this means configuring with a temp dir prefix and then re-building.  We must do it in a separate directory to avoid affecting other tests.

I'm planning on adding a test that does the following:

1. create a temp dir (TMPDIR)
2. copy the repo to TMPDIR/cpython
3. run configure there with --prefix=TMPDIR/python-installation
4. run make -j
5. run make install -j
6. write a simple script to TMPDIR/app.py
7. run the "freeze" tool on it, with minimal options
8. run the frozen app and verify it worked

Note that there needs to be enough disk space for all that (which not all buildbots have).  Also, the test will be relatively slow due to having to re-build.

There aren't any other tests that re-build Python or the like, so I'm a little hesitant to set precedent.  Perhaps that's why there weren't any tests already.  However, I don't see any significant reasons to not add the test (as long as it doesn't lead to spurious failures).

New changeset 13d9205f4057eeeef80a25d410ad123876dc60cd by Eric Snow in branch 'main':
bpo-45629: Add a test for the "freeze" tool. (gh-29222)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/13d9205f4057eeeef80a25d410ad123876dc60cd

New changeset 8726067ace98a27557e9fdf1a8e1c509c37cfcfc by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'main':
bpo-45629: Improve test.support.skip_if_buildbot (GH-31094)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/8726067ace98a27557e9fdf1a8e1c509c37cfcfc