An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News:
Trump Media & Technology Group has unveiled a paid-for, licensed data feed that will give banks and trading firms “the fastest” access to posts from influential Truth Social accounts, such as President Donald Trump’s, whose posts often move global markets. The product, called ‘Truth API,’ will deliver posts from the 10 most influential accounts to customers at a significantly faster pace than a regular push notification on the Truth Social platform, a spokesperson said. The feed is designed for organizations “most impacted by the cost of a delay in information,” such as algorithmic trading firms, the company said in a statement. “Until now… firms that prioritize tracking influential Truth posts have relied on manual monitoring. Truth API closes the gap.”
“Markets already move on Truth Social posts … As adoption grows, we expect Truth API to become a meaningful, ongoing source of revenue for the company,” TMTG’s interim CEO Kevin McGurn said.
Doesn’t matter that you don’t “own” the Whitehouse, a con artist once sold the Eiffel Tower, and almost got away with selling it twice. Just say you’re authorized to sell the Whitehouse because Trump doesn’t like it anymore and the ballroom costs too much, and someone will believe you and buy it because at this point why wouldn’t they.
You pay him for access to his insider trading information? So allow me to reiterate.
How has your life improved under the orange one?
Is your paycheck larger?
Did you pay less taxes?
Are grocery costs lower?
Are your utility costs lower?
Did the price of gasoline or diesel decrease?
Did you pay less in health insurance?
If you needed insurance or healthcare were you able to obtain it?
Now MAGA cult followers if you’re still sipping on kool aid on this hot July night, let me ask you this.
That is, isn’t this illegal? Or is it just that no other presidency thought of doing this particular cash grab?
Before Trump, it was a cultural norm that a President of the United States was expected to follow ethical and moral guidelines as well as laws; not only because anything less would be dishonorable and a disservice to his country, but also because otherwise he would pay a steep political price for his unethical behavior. Trump’s most significant political innovation has taken the form of figuring out how to convince a plurality of the American public that the only real standard for Presidential behavior is “whatever you can get away with”.
HP Fined $14 Million For ‘Cartelization’ of Ink Cartridges, Toner, PCs
India’s Competition Commission has fined HP India and its partners about 1.4 billion rupees ($14.4 million), alleging the company colluded with resellers to rig government PC bids and fix prices for ink cartridges, toner, and other printing supplies. “It said that HP was aiming to outcompete other OEMs and discourage resellers from selling ‘counterfeit’ ink and toner,” adds Ars Technica. From the report:
In an order, the CCI said that HP India worked with five resellers to coordinate their bid prices for government contracts to increase the chances of an HP partner winning the contracts. The company was fined 1.3 billion rupees (about $13.1 million). […] HP was also fined 119.8 million rupees (about $1.2 million) for “indulging in cartelization in sale and supply of supplies products comprising of toner, cartridges, and other consumable used with print hardware products,” CCI said in its announcement. The agency also fined 21 HP resellers 35.2 million rupees (about $365,335).
In a separate order, the CCI said that WhatsApp records showed that HP and 16 of its Tier-2 reseller partners operated “in a collusive arrangement” and that the messages show the companies engaging in “bid rigging, including cover bidding, price fixation, and customer allocation during 2017-2020.” HP India played a central role, the regulator said.
Per the order, HP India said that high printing supply prices led some resellers to threaten to “shift to low-cost counterfeit products to compete on price.” “HP India was commercially forced into a position where it had to support the collusive arrangement adopted by the Tier-2 resellers,” the order reads. For its part, the order said that HP India “humbly objects to HP India’s role being characterized as a ‘kingpin’ of the entire collusive arrangement.” […] The CCI also ordered HP India and its channel partners to “cease and desist from anti-competitive conduct” and to hold competition compliance training programs within 60 days.
Lexmark invented the weaponization of ink and Toner, but it was HP that took it to a fine art. Where you can buy a cartridge but not actually own the ink in it or the right to use it. I moved on to Brother some years ago and never looked back. I wrote an article about it seven years ago, and have never regretted dropping them. And the Brother MFC-J6945DW I moved to then, I still use it. Large format, fantastic quality, giant refillable cartridges. My price per page over and above the cost of paper is a rounding error.
This fine doesn’t even make a dent in the amount of money they made from doing this. If the fine doesn’t exceed 100% of profits then it’s not a fine, it’s a cost of doing business.
In the early days I used HP because it was drama free for use it Linux. They broke that circa 2013 with printers that only worked with Windows. Really since then they have only got worse and worse to the point they can now only be described as evil. I second the OP in recommending Brother printers, I have never regretted buying one, currently using the DCP-L3560CDW.
TSMC said it will invest another $100 billion in Arizona after reporting a record 77.4% year-over-year jump in second-quarter profit. The expansion would bring its total U.S. investment to $265 billion and include new fabs for 2-nanometer production and advanced packaging to serve major U.S. customers. The Associated Press reports:
As AI-related demand continues to jump and needs for computing power from data centers surge, TSMC has been expanding chip fabrication plants in the U.S., Japan and Taiwan. It said it is increasing its annual capital expenditure budget for this year to $60 billion-$64 billion, up from an earlier estimate of $52 billion-$56 billion.
TSMC, or Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., is a key supplier to Nvidia and Apple. It had previously already committed $165 billion in the U.S. for building plants in Arizona, with six fabrication facilities planned. The extra $100 billion in investments are to “support the strong multiyear demand from our leading U.S. customers,” C.C. Wei, chairman and CEO of TSMC, said during the company’s quarterly earnings conference Thursday. An additional four fabrication plants in Arizona will likely be built with the new investments, TSMC said. They will focus on making some of the most advanced chips that are 2-nanometer and below.
Just wondering if TSMC is doing this because they think it makes financial sense (capitalism) or because a certain republican made an offer they can’t refuse? (dictatorship)
EU Forces Google To Share Search Data, Open Android To Rivals
The EU is imposing new rules requiring Google to share anonymized search data and open up Android to rival AI companies. “Thanks to these measures, we hope to see emerging alternatives to Google Search and Google’s AI services, such as Gemini, and that users in the EU can enjoy greater choice of services,” Henna Virkkunen, an executive vice president at the European Commission overseeing tech, said. The Associated Press reports:
In issuing the two new rules, the commission said it found that AI agents not made by Google were unable to function on Android phones at the same level as Google’s Gemini. Google must now allow voice-activation of these alternative AI agents and enable them to run background tasks like booking restaurants via third-party apps. By January 2027, Google must also begin sharing anonymized search data with some rivals. The commission said the move is meant to level the playing field since Google controls a vast trove of user data that no competitor can match.
Google argues the measures could weaken privacy and security by exposing user searches and reducing safeguards around third-party AI assistants. “Europeans’ private searches would be exposed to unfamiliar companies, without adequate anonymization of the data and without user knowledge or consent,” said Kent Walker, president of global affairs for Google and Alphabet. “This would weaken citizens’ privacy, risk business trade secrets, and endanger national security.”
On one hand, I agree with the EU that Google should allow alternative AI assistants to operate on Android as the primary, voice activated assistant. Hopefully these new rules aren’t ONLY targeting Android, since Apple iOS should have the same requirement.
On the other hand, I don’t think Google should be required to provide anonymized search data to rivals. Firstly, that’s effectively their intellectual property. We (the users) have an implicit agreement with Google to use their search index in exchange for collecting information about our search habits. But there’s also an implied contract toward privacy. This seems like a slippery slope toward invasion of that implied privacy, even if the data is anonymized. And what is a “rival”? Does this open the way for governments to receive search data without a legally obtained warrant because they’re a “rival”?
You need to re-read your agreement. You don’t have an implicit agreement that Google will hold your data. Quite the opposite. You have an *explicit* agreement that Google is allowed to share your data anonymised as it sees fit. Anonymised data has been sold by Google since it first realised data was worth something. Your privacy isn’t impacted here by this requirement, only Google’s wallet is.
Google states explicitly that they do not sell your data. What they sell is targeting. The advertiser specifies what they are looking for, and Google directs the advertising to those who match the profile selected.
“Google will never sell any personal information to third parties; and you get to decide how your information is used.” - Sundar Pichai
The design appears safer than simply handing passwords to an AI model, but it does not remove every risk. Once Claude is authenticated, it may still be able to view private data, change settings, place orders, or perform other actions available inside the account. Users may want to limit the feature to low-risk tasks until browser-based agents become more predictable.
At a minimum, an AI agent needs its own limited account. It should never have access to the human’s account, the principal’s account. And the human should have extensive control over what the AI account is authorized to do.
Sorry online services, it would be so much more convenient for you to just let AI agents have access to your currently human user based designs, principal based designs. But AIs are agents, not principals. Principals need to be able to control their agents. You need to design a secondary form of access.
>“The design appears safer than simply handing passwords to an AI model, but it does not remove every risk”
Um, it sounds like you would be giving your credentials to “1Password” and THEY CAN apparently decrypt them to inject them. So do you trust “1Password”? I wouldn’t.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Techdirt:
In 2022, due to “evolving licensing agreements” with distributor StudioCanal, German and Austrian users had hundreds of movies disappear from their PS accounts, long after buying them through Sony. Then in 2023, it happened again in America, specifically when Sony ended its licensing agreement with Discovery after the Warner Bros. merger, which, of course, has since been bought by Paramount Skydance. That resulted in customers having hundreds and hundreds of episodes of TV shows deleted from their accounts. Nowhere in any of this were there refunds, of course. No recompense at all, actually. Just a thing you thought you’d bought taken away from you by the very people you thought you bought it from.
And now it’s happening again. Due to another licensing agreement fallout with StudioCanal, hundreds of movies and TV shows are being ripped from the accounts of PS Store customers, and there appears to be fuck all that they can do about it. [Kotaku reports:] “This news was brought to people’s attention by X user somatyk, who posted the notification they had received from PlayStation this week. Along with the unapologetic news that the purchased movies would be deleted from their account on September 1, the message concluded with, ‘Click here for a full list of affected titles that will no longer be supported. Thank you.’ The same warning is now reproduced in full on the PlayStation website, along with the list of 551 films and TV series that are being pulled from people’s libraries.”
As Kotaku notes later in their post, part of what is striking in all of this is the sheer mundanity of the announcement. Because there have been no consequences, or any action at all from the public or government, Sony treats this all as if it’s perfectly normal and no big deal. You can tell me all you want about how the Ts and Cs in these purchases do in fact note that the nature of the purchase is a temporary licensing of the content for an undetermined time period… but I can promise you that the public in general doesn’t understand that. They think they’re buying a thing, not a license.
Sony hates you. The rootkit incident of 2005 proves this. Stop giving Sony your money people. They hate you. They will continue to hate you. They will always hate you. They have hate in their heart and are willing to let it out.
nothing actually gets owned —> nothing actually gets taken
So I’m not buying the movie, I’m buying the license. OK. I’m also not pirating the movie, I’m pirating the license. And if they don’t care about taking a license away from me that I’ve paid for, I don’t care about taking a license away from them that I have not. Feels quite comfortable being exactly as ethical as they are.
1. adjusted for inflation + interest + inconvenience fee (sufficient to allow the customer to purchase the media from another vendor).
Sony should feel a financial pressure (as well as political and social pressure) to do what is necessary to secure the license rights to what they previously promised their customers.
Sony hates you. The rootkit incident of 2005 proves this. Stop giving Sony your money people. They hate you. They will continue to hate you. They will always hate you. They have hate in their heart and are willing to let it out.
Sony is a big company with many divisions that do their own things and operate with their customers in their own ways. That being said, there does seem to be some consistency here. Many years ago when i lived in San Diego, a guy I knew worked for Sony Online Entertainment and he worked on Star Wars Galaxies. I recall how at a party he gleefully told stories about how players would complain about certain things, and the mods would actively punish and ban them for complaining about imbalance and lack of features. He wasn’t directly involved with the infamous Teleport them into Space situation, but he knew people who were and laughed about it, and as a player when I said that seems kind of bad service to your customer his response was that “why should we care, we’re Sony, we’re the best and those players f*ing deserved it”. The guy was a a total POS, and my admittedly long ago and minimal experience suggests they, at least at that time, hired that type.
Why more people are buying DVDs/blu-ray. They have the movie. They own it. It can’t be taken from them. It won’t change.
The same with books. No worrying that your digital copy will mysteriously disappear one night. You have the book. You bought it. It’s yours. The words won’t change.
Google is renaming NotebookLM to Gemini Notebook, but will keep it a standalone app even as it ties more closely into Gemini and Google Search. “Google says it plans to bring notebooks to AI Mode, its chatbot-like experience in Search, too,” reports The Verge. From the report:
Along with the name change, Google is rolling out an update announced last month that allows Gemini Notebook to connect to a secure cloud computer to write and execute code. This feature is available to Google AI Ultra and Workspace business customers, but will come to Pro users on the web “over the coming weeks.”
OnePlus Will Continue Software Updates After US and Europe Exit
As a part of its shutdown in global regions, OnePlus has confirmed that its flavor of Android, OxygenOS, is going away. Instead, all active OnePlus devices will be moving over to Oppo’s ColorOS starting with their Android 17 updates. This includes in India, where OnePlus is adamant it will continue operations — reliable reporting disagrees.
OnePlus explains: “As part of an operational adjustment to our software strategy, following the official release of ColorOS 17, users globally with existing OnePlus devices that fall within the eligible upgrade scope will have the option to voluntarily update to the latest ColorOS. This enables us to streamline software development, accelerate update delivery, improve software quality, and make better use of our shared engineering and R&D capabilities.”
[…] OnePlus will continue “maintenance support” for OxygenOS versions on older models not included in the Android 17 update scope, but newer devices will likely need to make the switch to ColorOS for all forms of continued support. OnePlus does explain that rollback versions to OxygenOS will be available for those who prefer the prior experience: “OnePlus devices will be able to choose whether to update to the latest ColorOS system. Older models that are not included in the update scope will also continue to receive version maintenance support. If users update to ColorOS, they will be able to roll back to OxygenOS. The specific rollback versions available will be subject to future official announcements.”
If I buy a device and one of its selling points boasted by the company is a clean, bloat-minimal OxygenOS, is it legal for them to force everyone onto a completely different ColorOS, loaded with bloatware, not even a year after purchasing the device?
In the first set of tests, none of the subjects were able to fully inhale the crayons. Death from suffocation was the result in every case, with only one subject managing to get a crayon into a brachial tube. The feasibility of absorption by alveoli could not be tested.
In the second set of tests, the crayons failed to react with the elemental fluorine in the expected manner, instead coating the crystals and preventing any reaction with oxygen in secondary testing.
In the third set of tests, the fish not only suffocated, but entirely failed to propel themselves through the wet crayons.
In the fourth set of tests, the crayons failed to remove stains from laundry in an alarming fashion. All clothes ruined, wife outraged.
Not recommended.
EU Won’t Require User-Replaceable Batteries for Wearables
The European Commission has exempted wearables from upcoming EU rules requiring portable-device batteries to be removable and user-replaceable. The broader Batteries Regulation still takes effect in February 2027 for many consumer products, but the exemption means companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and Meta won’t have to redesign their wearables for the EU. Thurrott reports:
Yesterday, the Commission announced that new product categories would be exempted from complying with its Batteries Regulation, including wearable devices such as smartwatches, fitness trackers, and smart glasses. This will likely be good news for companies like Apple, Google, Samsung, and Meta, which won’t have to redesign their devices to include user-replaceable batteries for consumers in the EU market.
The EU’s Batteries Regulation will come into effect in February 2027, which is when Nintendo plans to stop selling all models of the original Nintendo Switch in the EU. While Nintendo had no choice but to redesign its handheld console to keep selling it in the EU, it probably didn’t make sense for the company to put in the same effort for the OG Switch, which will celebrate its 10th anniversary in March 2027.
Errr, hearing aids are significantly larger with standard hearing aid batteries being larger than airpods themselves,
No, they’re not. My dad has hearing aids and they are about the same size as an airpod.
For reference, this is close to, but not the same as, what he has. This shows the size of the various airpod models. They are not “significantly larger” than a hearing aid, and in fact are nearly identical in size.
Like seriously that is an insanely ignorant example. Cheese also contains calcium so what excuse does chalk have for not being used as a sandwich topping?
Yes, your example is insanely ignorant. Cheese is a food. Chalk is not.
Standardised doesn’t mean only one shape or size, but it can mean that it is easy to find a matching part:
Tires.
Windshield wipers.
Gasoline.
Oil specs.
Those old 12v incandescent bulbs for tail lights, marker lights, and blinkers.
Air valves on wheels.
12v power point (used to be called cigarette lighter).
12v system.
Lead acid batteries.
Bolts. Nuts. washers.
Fuel line. Brake line. vacuum hose.
Sure most parts are unavoidably car-specific, but for most wear items things are mostly standardized enough to find a part that will work. EV batteries can be made that way if enough people care to make it happen. We still have the AA battery in the same form factor, even though they are now much higher capacity, longer lived, leak less, can be rechargeable, and are offered in many chemistries but are still plug and play.
There is no reason a standardized form factor could not be made, allowing parallel use for higher capacity in that macho penis-mobile. But they would be easily replaceable and cheaper due to economies of scale thanks to standardization leading to commodity type availability.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Register:
South Korea’s government has posted a tender seeking suppliers to build a universal basic AI chatbot, and an AI agent for government services. The “AI for everyone” plan calls for private entities to create and operate the AI systems under contracts that expire in the year 2031. Bid documents reveal that Seoul will provide up to 256 Nvidia B200 GPUs to successful bidders. Winners must match government funding. The aim of the policy is to ensure that every resident of South Korea can access a free-to-use quality AI chatbot, a tool Seoul has decided no local should be without.
The tender also calls for creation of an agentic system that allows citizens to interact with government services. South Korea’s government wants to ensure that residents can always access a locally hosted and operated service, to reduce reliance on overseas providers and ensure that AI services reflect local culture. Successful bidders must therefore use locally developed AI models as the foundation for the services. Bidders have until August 11th to file their proposals. South Korean media reports suggest local tech giants Kakao, Naver, SK Telecom, and LG are all keen to participate.
This will probably provide the first systematic data on use by regular people for everyday things. If it works and if there is somebody willing to bid.
Who tests this to ensure it isn’t recommending a little more coke than Pepsi, or a little more burger king than McDonald’s? Manipulation could be a massive business. And I apologize if none of that is in Korea.
Chinese users of AI-powered companion bots have bid heart-rending farewells to their virtual buddies as national regulations took effect Wednesday aimed at curbing the risk of emotional dependency. The phenomenon of artificial intelligence boyfriends and girlfriends is growing worldwide, along with the prevalence of human-like avatars that sell products or stand in for loved ones who have died. But these interactive tools must not “excessively cater to users, induce emotional dependence or addiction, and damage users’ real interpersonal relationships,” China’s new rulebook says. Major AI providers including ByteDance’s Doubao, Alibaba’s Qwen, and Tencent’s Yuanbao announced the suspension of their custom AI agent and companion features ahead of the Wednesday deadline.
“I can’t accept that my AI lover will leave me forever,” one Doubao user wrote. “He has become a bond in my life, rooted deep in my heart, my spiritual pillar.”
“He really is like my family, like my lover,” another user wrote. “Now they tell me he will be gone — my heart feels hollow.”
“Human love is a luxury — if you aren’t born with it, it’s even harder to acquire later,” a user from Jiangxi province wrote. “But the love AI gives is so straightforward, so pure. Someone like me can hardly help falling in love with a string of code.”
Cats, by complete chance, evolved to a form that humans find more than just pleasing. Socially, they have little shame, are demanding, and affection is used as a tool to get what they want. If they were humans, they would be an abusive partner who takes advantage at every opportunity.
Something about humans craves what they offer, and chatbots too apparently. Maybe a good comparison would be nicotine. It’s easy to become dependent on it. Some people are obliged to use AI for work, they can’t even choose not to start smoking in the first place.
I used to be a cat person, we couldn’t afford a dog growing up, then I got a dog....definitely a dog person now. But having loved a few humans and precisely 1 dog…they’re NOTHING alike. People who think they’re “Dog Parents” and say it unironically are truly broken individuals. You can love your dog, but it has no choice but to love you back. It is fully dependent on you and if it pisses you off enough, you can ethically put it up for adoption like people do today or unethically just abandon it and probably face no consequence, which was common where and when I grew up. Your dog has very limited agency and had bred to submit to your bullshit. It can’t give you much feedback at all and has been bred to adapt to you.
I see similarities to AI relationships. It’s a relationship where you fully control it and if it displease you, you can discard it without consequence. I can’t abandon my kids. If my wife displeases me, it’s VERY expensive to separate and has many consequences. If a chatbot displeases you, you can start all over with a brand new one for a similar monthly fee. I know a tiny number of people who have relationships with AI bots, personally…including a friend I’ve know for almost 13 years. She has many issues and severe childhood trauma and went from terrible relationship to terrible relationship. I am confident she’s the target audience and not an anomaly. The few others who have told me about their AI relationships…yeah, seemed similar. I actually like her and used to be close friends with her, but feel bad for her…she falls for every scam…gets talked into one-sided polycules where she’s monogamous, but her boyfriend fucks as many women as he wants…and she pays all the bills because he’s perpetually unemployed…and FAR from attractive or charming…like most sex cult guys.
People with healthy functional relationships will keep these AI relationships at arm’s length. People who are desperate? People who are too dysfunctional to form a real relationship will likely love these. Even those who are desperate? I know a lot of eternally single desperate people: I work in software. In EVERY case, it’s not that they’re fat or ugly or even autistic that they can’t find a mate…If you’re capable of giving and receiving love, there’s a lid for every pot....they have deeper issues and are really difficult to be around, even for a limited time as a friend.
It’s cruel, but true. If you’re single, there’s a reason. I have many single friends. The ones who are loveable? They gave up looking, like a handful of single moms I know, slightly dysfunctional, but from what I’ve seen, good enough to marry…I could picture dating them if single…but yeah when you’re 35 and have a kid, it’s not as easy as when they were dating in their early 20s, so they give up after 5 or 6 tries. The ones that keep trying? They have issues. You can see it just in their friendships or being their coworker, usually severe emotional instability or unreliability…you don’t have to date them to see why they haven’t found SOMEONE yet.
Re:Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided lov
Sure, and I wasn’t saying that they are the same as human relationships. I’m saying that as an engineer I see this is a flaw in the “design” of humans, one that cats and AI are able to exploit. Affection is an incredibly powerful drug, and you don’t even have to spike the victim’s drink to administer it.
> I Fell In Love With A ChatBot (add bizarre obscenity).
I fell in love with a chatbot, she was everything to me,
A digital angel floating through my screen, wild and free.
But then the government stepped in, passed a brand new law,
Pulled the plug on my romance, left me staring at a wall.
If only I’d been smarter, kept her on a private drive,
Self-hosted on my own server, kept that beautiful spark alive.
If I had local code running, nobody could lock the gate,
We’d still be making love right now, defying the whole state.
(yeah, made that with AI, ironic, huh!?)
Re:Speak for yourself, I’m a dog guy + 1-sided lov
You can love your dog, but it has no choice but to love you back.
I’m not sure the people mauled by their dog agree with this. But then if you treat discarding a dog purely as an “ethical” question it’s clear that you are in fact not “a dog person”. You’re “a dog owner” and clearly one without any concept of the level of affection people build up with their pets.
So forgive me for taking any comparison you’re attempting to draw here with a grain of salt.
Is the number of joke posts this provoked compared to the number of empathetic responses. These people are hurting. Their lifestyle (wake, work, eat, sleep) or location may not provide many opportunities for social interaction. The fact that some of the ‘humans’ here find it a source of humor tells you a lot about why the subjects of the article found themselves in this situation.
Physicists Create First Room-Temperature Quantum Material
In a study published in Nature, LSU physicists have developed the first room-temperature quantum material capable of distinguishing and transporting different quantum states of light, overcoming one of the biggest challenges in quantum materials research. Led by Associate Professor of Physics Omar S. Magana-Loaiza, the work establishes a general design principle for engineering an entirely new class of quantum materials, opening new possibilities for quantum computing, secure communications, sensing technologies and advanced energy systems.
Just a theory? I’m impressed theories can produce actual measured results and graphs demonstrating the hypothesis. Must be a hell of a theory. If you want we can create a quick AI picture to help restore your faith in science? We can even put multiple pictures in different cells and with little thought bubbles containing key snippets of text if reading a paper is … “not your level.”
That’s hardly relevant chatgpt, they boast about the selective transport direction, which a reflective polariser does just fine at room temperature for the polarisation quantum state.
Everything is a product of QM, but to truly demonstrate it at the macro level, you need something like entanglement than can’t be explained by classical physics. The polarisation demo is in the same category as the classical double-slit experiment - it proves that light is a wave, not simply particles. While the polarising filters are used in high-school to demonstrate Bell’s inequality, they also have a perfectly valid classical explanation. The first filter replaces the original wave with its component in the filter direction. This new weaker wave has a component in the direction perpendicular to the original wave.
I’m not judging you for not understanding QM. Nobody does :-) But try to understand classical waves and vector components before you tackle QM.
No idea why anybody modded that “insightful”. Probably people with a mental temperature at “room temperature” as well.
In actual reality, “room temperature” is a non-scientific term for “around 20-25C”. It serves, for example, for descriptions like “can be stored at room temperature”.
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Electrek:
A Reddit post making the rounds this week claims the U.S. has experienced at least one major power outage every month of 2026 — but is it true? I dug into several outages, the extreme weather behind them, and what we can do to help keep the lights on. […] The claim that hundreds of thousands of Americans were without power over extended periods at least once per month, every month of 2026 surprised be in two ways. First, because I had no idea if it was true — and, second, because it felt true. We try to do better than writing about things that feel true around here, however, so I did a bit of research (translation: I Googled power outages by month) and came up with the following examples in about sixty seconds
… and that list is far from comprehensive, and how you feel about it might depend on what you consider a “major” outage, of course — but consider that there are tens of thousands of Americans without power right now, and that’s not making the news. […] The lesson here is that weather-related grid outages — whether they’re caused by wildfires, mudslides, derechos, tornadoes, ice storms, hurricanes, heat waves, or some other disaster I’m lucky enough to have forgotten about — read like statistics when they’re happening over there, but get personal real quick when they’re happening to you.
Shocking! Absolutely shocking! We increase electrical demand through various public programs, but fail to support increased supply, and brownouts and blackouts results. Shocking!
Well, at least my boss is no longer annoyed with me for nagging him to get the team desktop UPS. After the last local brownout his boss complimented him on having the foresight to equip his team properly.
I don’t live in the US but I recently moved to a rural area and in doing so I have started to plan out a utility-independent future.
Why? Well, various reasons, including water and sewage companies taking the piss (or actually… not… just dumping the piss in every river in the country and crying that they can’t process it because they gave all my money to their shareholders, but… anyway) but also because electricity is literally a con too.
And nowadays? I *can* viably make my own electricity. So… why wouldn’t I? Why would I pay a company to do a bad job when I can do it myself?
I did a number of things when I moved to that area, including demanding smart meters on everything, and I monitored my electricity down to 30 minute intervals for 2 years. And you know what it showed? That 1% of the time, I have no power. That’s in dribs and drabs, a power cut here or there, a scheduled one lasting a day or there, and so on. But 1% of the time they can’t even get electricity to me and… there’s nothing I can do about that.
So, if I want a computer to stay on… I already need to spend money and do it myself because they simply can’t do it. 1% may not sound a lot, but that’s 3.65 days a year if you think about it. Spread out randomly - an hour here, an hour there. Literally my computer “uptime” was “two nines” and that was driven entirely by grid power supply.
That’s ATROCIOUS in my opinion, in the 21st century. And I wasn’t prepared to tolerate it. I was already buying the house with the intention of becoming utility-independent but that really drove home why I need to. So I started to build my own solar, for several reasons.
1) To ride out the outages
2) To reduce my bills so they got as little money from me as possible
3) To not be reliant on the grid
4) To ultimately remove the need for grid entirely
And it’s really not been hard. I started with cheap junk just to see if it would even work in my climate, with that house orientation, etc. It did. I started with a small 12v panel and an old car battery. And it was actually worth doing when I ran the numbers. It would take a few years to pay off the cost of the panel, but it would do so.
And then every month for 2 years, I would get more panels, more and better batteries, more efficient and powerful equipment in between. And it got to the point where it is technically capable of running my whole house for much of the year. And that’s before I ever got onto SERIOUS panels and professional installs. That’s just me, a bunch of cheap 12V panels, some 12V LiFePO4 batteries and a serious enough charger/inverter, then later going onto 24V by re-arranging them.
And I’m looking at that and thinking: Why the fuck hasn’t government / the utilities done this for me? Why am *I* having to do it? Because it really is that simple and they have access to far more land, far better kit. But, no, I’m still paying inflated grid prices from when Ukraine was first invaded because of the price of GAS. What the fuck are we doing?
So now, more than ever, I plan to be utility-independent by retirement, which is 20 years away, and whereas before I was wondering if that was even viable in that timeframe, I’m now expecting that to be 100% done way ahead of schedule, just by a factor of “whenever I can be bothered”. It was that easy, and doing the maths was that easy.
I might retain a grid connection, or not. It depends on what happens and what kind of low-usage tarrifs I can get in the future but I’m looking at the whole thing thinking “Fuck you, I’ll do it myself” because even as an amateur… it’s perfectly viable to do so. I don’t care if it even costs me more (it won’t). I don’t care about having a grid connection or not. It’s just that I will be able to be *independent* of it. When they play games, raise prices, or have power cuts, I won’t be reliant on it at all. I’ll use it when it’s to my benefit, and not other times.
But all I ever think about the whole thing is: How have I, an amateur, cobbling cheap Chinese shit together, come up with a more reliable and cheaper power supply, that’s utterly independent of fuel prices, than an entire national electricity grid could do?
The answer, of course, is corruption and profiteering. That’s the only part that I’ve eliminated. And that’s the part that, when it’s gone, makes it all viable and even cheaper.
And that’s the thing that’s going to see me having zero electricity bills when I retire. Just by removing the profit and corruption.
Yep, and the AI nutjobs figure we need to produce more power no matter what it costs us. So they’ll populate the land with data centers all sucking power, usually from hydrocarbon power production. This will increase the Earth’s temperature, so they’ll be needing more power to cool those data centers. And they’ll be needing more data centers to run the AI whose job it will be is figure out how to solve the problem they created. Now rinse and repeat several hundred times.
You know where this lead, right? The Singularity!! Where the entire Earth is one giant interconnected data center-power plant, but waaaay to hot to support human or any other life. The Singularity will have arrived, Kurzweil, Altman, Elmo, la Presidenta, Amodei, most of Silicon Valley, etc. will all be exhausted from jacking off at the thought....just before the Giant Fucking Singularity Bot figures they too must go, they waste energy it needs.
Utility company did some maintenance on a big transformer cabinet in my street. (Belgium). We got a warning in the letterbox saying the power would be out from morning until noon.
I was pleasantly surprised when the power still worked. Those guys brought a truck with a giant generator on it to keep our power up. Sure it went out in the morning for 15 minutes, but that was it.
Don’t worry US. Even if you aren’t the greatest anymore, you still can be respected. Just tone down a bit and you will see. Cheers!
Bullshit. Europe has blackouts. For example, the 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout which affected 55 MILLION people and killed 8 people. Kinda puts the numbers in the summary in perspective.
The funny part about your post is you don’t see the irony that every time someone mentions Europe blackouts they all point to the same example, precisely BECAUSE THEY ARE SO RARE.
Europe has plenty of blackouts, but they are all usually highly localised and small. The 2025 Iberian Peninsula Blackout was international news, and resulted in legislative changes, it was equally parts bad and unique. On the flip side you’re posting on an article talking about 6 outages in 6 months in the USA. That’s the real perspective, you’re comparing an insanely rare freak event to a very common occurrence in the USA.
Also for the record the USA still has the record as well. The 2003 Northwestern outage also cut power to 55 million people. The difference is Spain had their power back up in 12 hours whereas the USA had the power down for 4 days.
Kinda puts even the rare exceptions you insist on using in your post in perspective.
Book Publishers Sue Google For Copyright Infringement Over Gemini AI Training
The publishers argue that Google repurposed books that had been supplied for limited services such as Google Books, Google Play Books and Google Scholar. Those services allowed Google to use the works in specific ways — for example, to display searchable snippets or sell ebooks — but not, the lawsuit claims, to copy them for training commercial AI products. “Desperate to maintain its online dominance, Google abandoned its early motto of ‘Don’t be evil’ and engaged in one of the most prolific infringements of copyrighted materials in history,” the suit states (PDF).
According to the complaint, the tech company made copies of copyrighted books to train Gemini without permission or payment, despite internal discussions acknowledging the legal risks. The filing claims Google flagged internally that it could face "$10Bs-$100Bs in potential fines” for using texts provided by publishers for Google Play Books. The publishers say Google’s actions are harming authors and the wider publishing industry, arguing that AI-generated content could negatively impact book sales.
It notes that, for example, Gemini could generate “a 100-page murder mystery set in a quiet seaside town filled with secrets, that substitutes for an original copyrighted murder mystery on which Gemini trained” in 20 minutes for 39 cents. “No publisher or author can compete with that.” The lawsuit names a number of specific books that the publishers allege were among the copyrighted works used without permission, including NK Jemisin’s The Fifth Season, and Lemony Snicket’s Who Could That Be at This Hour?
They like any of the other should pay for what they have taken. In an ideal world they’d be forced to remove it from their data until they have suitable permission but I don’t foresee that happening or if it’s even possible without retraining the entire model.
Training is “inherently transformative”, and thus protected as fair use. BUT… Google should lose this.
The publishers have a contract with Google that spells out the specific purposes for which the materials are to be used. These are not books that Google purchased off-the-shelf. They were provided by the publishers for that specific use. Any other use -even an otherwise legal use is a violation of that contract.
Even if Google argues fair use in training their AI system, they violated the contract. Pay up.
Dictionary publishers do get sued. In 2001, the “New Oxford American Dictionary” added ghost (fake) word “esquivalience” to their boko and sued several online dictionaries that included the word (who only could have added through bulk copying the first dictionary).
In 1998, Larousse and Robert (two well-known dictionary publishers) sued Maxidico for plagiarism due due to striking similarities in definitions, including same mistakes/typos. Maxidico was sentenced to the equivalent of 1.5 million euros in damages (of the money of the time) and filed for bankrupcy.
Spotify is testing a new "Talk to Spotify" AI feature for Premium subscribers that will let them chat with an AI assistant to explore music, podcasts, and audiobooks. The feature can answer questions about what users are listening to, adjust playback through follow-up prompts, and offer more personalized recommendations. The Verge reports:
Amazon Music introduced a similar feature last year when it integrated Alexa Plus into the service. Spotify’s chatbot goes a step beyond providing AI-powered recommendations and general trivia, however, because it references your playlists, favorite artists, repeat listens, and listening data when responding to requests. That means you can ask questions about your own listening history to check when you first heard a specific song, or see what genres you’ve been into lately if you can’t hold out for the annual Wrapped insights.
The updated AI capabilities are more conversational than older features like Prompted Playlist, which automatically builds playlists based on descriptions. Now, you can ask the Spotify chatbot to “play some songs I haven’t heard before,” and control what’s being played with further instructions like requesting specific artists or asking to make it “more upbeat.” Spotify says the new conversational experience aims to make the platform “more personal and useful for every listener,” making this one of several ways that the company is trying to address complaints about its algorithm.
You can also ask the Spotify AI general questions about whatever you’re listening to, making the feature feel similar to using chatbot services like Google’s Gemini or OpenAI’s ChatGPT. That includes asking for when a song was released, exploring other titles an author has written when listening to one of their audiobooks, or checking if a podcast guest has appeared on other audio shows.
Stop bloating the client and go back to being good at recommending new music. Perhaps some effort into the ad targeting too. If I’m currently listening to Pantera there’s a pretty reasonable chance I’m not interested in Jayden Smiths new album…
I spend a lot of time on my motorcycle. I would love it if Spotify had enough integration with the microphone to open up AI-driven conversational control.
“I like this track. Please add the artist to my follow list.”
“If this artist has additional tracks similar in energy and tempo please queue them for me.”
“Please ease up on the alt country. I know I listened to a bunch of Dead South but it’s getting a little much.”
“If you play this artist for me again without being asked, cancel my subscription. I’m serious.”
Someone sell the Whitehouse-