Search Criteria
Package Details: patool 4.0.5-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/patool.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | patool |
| Description: | portable command line archive file manager |
| Upstream URL: | https://wummel.github.io/patool/ |
| Keywords: | archiv |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-only |
| Submitter: | None |
| Maintainer: | TrialnError |
| Last Packager: | TrialnError |
| Votes: | 67 |
| Popularity: | 2.49 |
| First Submitted: | 2013-02-25 06:33 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-07-06 21:07 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- python
- python-argcomplete (make)
- python-build (make)
- python-installer (make)
- python-setuptools-reproducibleAUR (make)
- python-wheel (make)
- 7zip (p7zip-natspecAUR, 7zip-natspecAUR, 7zip-zstd-binAUR, 7zip-zstdAUR) (optional) – extracting various not natively supported formats (upstream suggested)
- lz4 (lz4-gitAUR) (optional) – extracting LZ4 archives
- unarchiver (optional) – extracting various not natively supported formats
- unrar (rarAUR) (optional) – extracting RAR files
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »
TrialnError commented on 2026-07-06 20:16 (UTC) (edited on 2026-07-06 20:38 (UTC) by TrialnError)
As Arch is on
python 3.14, it will use the built-in module (compression.zstd). So still no dep onpython-pyzstd. But I should likely remove the direct zstd dep, as I misread something in the past (or it changed in the meantime).python-argcompleteis optional. But it should likely be listed in optdeps to make people aware.Edit: And the license has just a typo. In general there was an attempt to make it SPDX compliant.
Edit2: No,
python-argcompletewon't be added to optdepends. It requires additional steps which is outside of thePKGBUILD.TrialnError commented on 2026-07-06 20:01 (UTC) (edited on 2026-07-06 20:44 (UTC) by TrialnError)
Oh, don't worry. I'm generally using a clean build environment (unless I want to check on some changes quickly, which bit me a bit with my comment on the ntfsprogs package).
And I'm aware of
namcap. But it also has some flaws (especially with python based packages, but there are more quirks), therefore I additionally use tools likereadelf. And IIRC it isn't advised to blindly follow thenamcapoutput.Nonetheless: Thanks for the report, I will check
HurricanePootis commented on 2026-07-06 19:45 (UTC) (edited on 2026-07-06 19:49 (UTC) by HurricanePootis)
Hi,
This package needs the following changes:
license()SPDX compliant, as per the guidelinespython-argcompleteandpython-pyzstdfromdepends()I am creating this comment as I saw your comment under
ntfsprogs-plus. It seems like as a packager, you have not been using tools likenamcapnorextra-x86-64-buildto check your packages for the right depends, any errors, or building in a clean chroot (maybe). I don't wanna put a comment under all of your packages, but I highly implore you to go through ever single one of your packages withnamcap, as it is very easy to have wrong stuff in PKGBUILDs.jose1711 commented on 2026-05-06 20:37 (UTC)
For
paruthe following works:keriefie commented on 2026-02-26 12:49 (UTC)
Paru is basically a pacman wrapper. Clearing the cache fixed the issue, thank you. I previously tried only
paru -Scc(rather thanparu -Sccc) which had not done anything.TrialnError commented on 2026-02-25 21:20 (UTC)
Hello keriefie.
I'm not familiar with the internals of
paru, but as Dominiquini said, there is some caching involved.parugets the task to install packagexyzand a check with the local package cache (and maybe builddir) results in"This was already build so let us just use this generated package". Which is not a rebuild in the sense that a completly new pacman-package is created.One way to solve this would be the way Dominiquini describes. But I assume this will delete the whole cache which may be undesireable. An alternative could be to simply search for any
python-setuptools-reproduciblepackage and only delete those. Locations to check would be somewhere in~/.cache/paru/(and maybe the one from pacman/var/cache/pacman/pkg).Dominiquini commented on 2026-02-25 20:32 (UTC) (edited on 2026-02-25 20:33 (UTC) by Dominiquini)
@keriefie: Maybe it's a cache issue. Try
keriefie commented on 2026-02-25 11:55 (UTC)
Apologies. You keep saying rebuild, but I don't know what you mean. I have tried doing
paru -R python-setuptools-reproduciblefollowed byparu -S python-setuptools-reproducible, but this has not solved the issue.sudo pacman -Qo /usr/lib/python3.13/still outputs forpython-setuptools-reproducible.TrialnError commented on 2026-02-07 17:30 (UTC)
Hello carlosnewmusic. Please rebuild
python-setuptools-reproducible. Your locally available package is forpython 3.13and therefore cannot be found withpython 3.14.Also please take note of previous comments.
carlosnewmusic commented on 2026-02-07 11:37 (UTC)
build error https://pastes.io/patool-bui
1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »