This was not an “expert committee”, it didn’t take them five years, and the proof is just as wrong today as it was three years ago when it got posted online. Very sad that people get excited by such a bizarre “verification” process. This isn’t peer review.
The Riemann Hypothesis is a mathematical problem that has remained unsolved for 161 years—until mathematical physicist Kumar Eswaran from Hyderabad did it. It took five years for an expert committee to approve the proof -- and a $1 million prize: deccanchronicle.com/nation/in-othe…
Hilarious. Someone was tasked with creating a stock image for math cheating, so they plastered some random math formulas on a fingernail. They didn’t realize that when you copy and paste math into Photoshop, you get LaTeX source code instead of actual readable math.
Another fantastic video from @3Blue1Brown. I have a feeling my Pi manifesto is the target of a little well-earned jab at the beginning there, but that’s cool ;-)
New video! "The stunning geometry behind this surprising equation". Primarily written and animated by newest 3b1b team member @BenHambrecht.
Why is 1+1/4+1/9+1/16+... = π²/6
youtu.be/d-o3eB9sfls
