
Early Access: Per-document approval chains: the right approvers for every document
This is currently in private preview, but if you want access earlier, keep reading.
One approval chain for every document never fit complicated approval processes. You can now assign an approval chain unique to each document, mirroring the policy approval experience you already know. Approvers automatically get access to exactly what they need to review, and that access ends when theyβre removed from the chain, so no one needs broad org-level document permissions just to sign off. Existing global-chain approvals keep working as they do today.
Want in early? Complete the workflow.
β οΈ Deadline to express interest: Friday, November 6, 12pm EST.
---
Availability: Plus plans and above
Bitbucket integration, rebuilt
The Bitbucket integration has been rebuilt from the ground up, giving you more control before the first sync and more clarity when something needs fixing. Choose which repositories Vanta syncs before the first sync: all of them, all except specific ones, or only specific ones. During setup, a permission check tells you right away if the connecting account canβt read a workspace, so you hear about it in the connection flow instead of after the first sync.
Once youβre connected, you get more visibility:
Listing page: See the resource schemas and permissions
Activity log: Review sync history, error details, and AI remediation steps
Vanta Agent: Ask it to help you connect the integration or answer questions about it
Syncs are also faster and more reliable, with better data coverage.
---
Availability: Available today for customers connecting Bitbucket for the first time. Existing Bitbucket customers will move over progressively, with no action required. Stay tuned
This week in the Vanta Community
Members we met in π[private feed]: Griffin N. omieibi.bagshaw Allen H.
New members we welcomed this week and last week (please share your intro in π[private feed] when you're ready!) john.costa ankur.βpalkar zac Armin N. Haralambos B. mariald mkhokhar Nana K. Vlad S. OlimpiuGD Pete J. Tudor L. danwilliams Ivan S. Pablo A. ramon Hunter M. yassin w. cstark oussama.benzaouia Janet Y. Pablo A. Clement U. bobbystoskopf matej.perkovic Stephanie E. martha.george Maggie M. Vlad S. Kari D. Darshil S. Loyal B. Aimee H. Kelly S. Brandon B. Alex T. Francisco P. Fernanda G. Ben L. Alex K. Kerry S. tyler460 jacob.barnes rafael.martinezmontie Leo Phil M. Jeffrey G.
All-things AI Governance and Vanta with GRC expert, Kareem M.
You don't want to miss this, esp after VantaCon. Register here
ΒΏHablas espaΓ±ol? Conoce a otros clientes de Vanta, comparte ideas y haz preguntas en nuestra comunidad privada de LATAM aquΓ. Β‘Γnete ahora! cc: Erick M.
Who wants to be featured at VantaCon?
Read here for more (you do not need to be attending in-person to participate
Congrats, Aditya R. and team!
Discussion-starters and highlights: Please jump into these conversations and offer your POV
Clement U. is planning compliance for a fintech platform from scratch: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and NIST SP 800-171. What order should he tackle them in? Greg B. B. has already shared a smart plan, so add yours. Respond with your POV here
Jake T. wants to run his annual pentest in staging, not production. He plans to back it up with config comparisons, infrastructure-as-code commit IDs and a sign-off from leadership. Is that enough for a SOC 2 Type II audit? Respond with your POV here
Collin R. wants to run access reviews for specific Microsoft Entra groups in Vanta. Should he upload the group members by hand, or use the synced groups under Personnel? Share your setup here
Any UK or EU teams running FedRAMP Moderate? Harry R.. has one US engineer covering both the GRC work and the FedRAMP environment, and wants to know how you manage the workload. Respond with your POV here
How are you showing auditors you meet ISO 27001 control A.6.5 (responsibilities after someone leaves or changes roles)? Fawaz wants to know what evidence you provide. Respond with your POV here
UK folks: Abbie V. is looking for free ways to meet GOV-108 (contact with special interest groups). Share your recs here
Rachael H.'s team uses Macs, and she needs an IT provider that can also manage their devices (MDM). Share your rec here
so if you care to find me, look to the western sky π[private feed] ![]()
Make Vantaβs risk scoring speak your language
Your risk methodology has its own terms, so your risk scoring should too.
Admins can now view and edit their scoring profile, stage names, and descriptions right in risk settings, so reviewers see familiar guidance at every stage instead of translating Vantaβs labels into yours. Each scoring stage, such as inherent, residual, and target risk, has a name and a description. Defaults are prefilled if you havenβt set any, and any custom text you already have is preserved.
π₯ demo!
---
Availability: New customers now. Existing customers can join early access starting Nov 2, with sign-up required.
Ask the Vanta Agent about your risk score definitions
Need to check what your risk score stages mean, or change them? You can now ask the Vanta Agent about your configured stage names and definitions, and make supported updates right in the conversation, with no detour through a separate settings flow.
If you change your profile types, the agent walks you through whether your existing scores should count as Inherent or Residual, since teams define βinherent riskβ differently, either before or after controls are applied.
Your risk vocabulary, one question away.
π₯ demo!
A note on timing: This release is for new customers to Vanta. For current customers: If you're interested, early access opens for you starting Nov 2, and you can sign up here. If you have the Advanced Risk Management sku, also get early access to several other new Risk features, shown in this demo.
---
Availability: Essentials, Plus, Professional, Scale, and Enterprise (Modular) plans with Compliance & Audit Management, Advanced Risk Mgmt (where applicable).
Automated tests for your AI use cases and AI assessments
Proving that your AI documentation stays maintained shouldnβt mean checking it by hand. New automated tests now monitor your AI use cases and AI assessments, and you can link them to controls in AI frameworks, so continuous, automated evidence backs up your compliance work.
Let the tests keep watch over your AI documentation.
UPDATE: More to come on this at VantaCon!
Iru integration, rebuilt
The Iru integration has been rebuilt from the ground up, with more control before the first sync and more visibility when something goes wrong.
You decide what comes in before anything syncs. Choose device groups to exclude before the first sync, so thereβs no more connecting, letting every device flow in, and cleaning up afterward. Every platform Iru returns now syncs too, including iPhone, iPad, Apple TV, and Android, where the previous integration covered only Mac and Windows.
When something needs attention, you get the details:
Listing page: See the resource schemas and permissions
Activity log: Review sync history, error details, and AI remediation steps
Vanta Agent: Ask it to help you connect the integration or answer questions about it
Syncs are also faster and more reliable, with better data coverage. ![]()
.png)
Security, compliance, and trust challenges donβt always come with a playbook. Trust Circles brings together groups of practitioners facing similar challenges to swap ideas, share whatβs working, and learn from each other through virtual roundtables and ongoing conversations in the Vanta Community.
No product pitches, just real conversations. Guided by the Chatham House Rule, you can share what you learn, but not who you learned it from.
Find your Trust Circle
Explore Trust Circles
Find a Circle that speaks to what youβre working on, the challenges youβre tackling, or the people youβd like to connect with. Weβre actively recruiting members for the Circles below, and your interest helps bring them to life!
Donβt see one that resonates? We want to hear your ideas! Tell us what your ideal Circle would look like, who youβd want to connect with, and what topics youβd explore together.
The Trust Boardroom β Communicating security, risk, and compliance priorities to executives and your board.
Risk Takers β Identifying, assessing, and managing risks across your business and third-party vendors.
AI Governance β Building policies and processes to manage AI risks and support responsible AI use.
Trust, Automated with AI β For builders exploring MCP, APIs, and AI agents to automate workflows and scale their impact.
Women Shaping Trust β Connecting women working in security, compliance, risk, privacy, and IT.
Early Career Builders β Connecting with others early in their security, compliance, or risk careers.
Compliance from scratch β Getting your first compliance program up and running, from policies to audits.
Who can join Trust Circles?
Be a Vanta customer: You must be an active Vanta customer to participate Be a Vanta Community member: Trust Circles live within the Vanta Community, so membership is required. If you haven't, request to join the Vanta Community now! Come ready to participate: Be willing to share experiences, exchange ideas, and actively engage with your fellow Circle members.
See thread below for a Trust Circles FAQ
hey guys! we just launched publicly on YC, linkedin, and X! would love any engagement you guys could give! links: x: x.com/ad1tyaranjan/status/2115556461539627321 linkedin:lnkd.in/p/gTSGbP-5 YC: ycombinator.com/launches/Wb9-graypass-the-most-dangerous-actions-happen-after-login
Questionnaire reporting on demand, from the Vanta Agent
Showing leadership how your team is doing on questionnaires, whether turnaround is improving, where work stalls, and how much AI answers save you, now takes one question. The Vanta Agent can query and chart your Questionnaire Automation data in natural language, and you can shape each report to fit what you need.
The data covers the full lifecycle of questionnaires and questions: when each was created, assigned, answered, approved, and completed, plus where each answer came from, whether AI, the original questionnaire file, or a person.
Try asking the Vanta Agent:
βHow many questionnaires did we complete month by month in the last 6 months, and what share were on time?β
βChart monthly AI answer coverage, including Answer Library matches and AI-generated answers, and the share accepted without edits, for the last 6 months. Is each improving?β
βChart active open questionnaire items per owner as a stacked bar by age bucket, and call out who is overloaded and whose work is stalling.β
π₯ demo! --- Availability: Any Questionnaire Automation customer with AI opt-in enabled
Kareem M.(Host)
Jeralyn A.(Host)
Jeralyn A.(Speaker)
