websights

Fill out the form to download

Required field
Required field
Not a valid email address
Required field
Required field

Documentation

Validation Case: Hollow Sphere, Release of Power

This validation case belongs to heat transfer, with the case of a hollow sphere under release of power condition. The aim of this test case is to validate the following parameters:

  • Steady state heat transfer
  • Volumetric heat source

The simulation results of SimScale were compared to the numerical results presented in [TPLV06]\(^1\).

Geometry

The geometry used for the case is as follows:

geometry model validation case hollow sphere power release
Figure 1: Only one portion of the hollow sphere is modeled

It represents a section of a hollow sphere with an internal radius of 1 \(m\) and an external radius of 2 \(m\). Face ABCD is the internal face and EFGH is the external face. Axis X passes through the centroid of both faces, making the volume symmetric across the XY and XZ planes.

Analysis Type and Mesh

Tool Type: Code_Aster

Analysis Type: Heat transfer, linear, steady state.

Mesh and Element Types:

CaseMesh TypeNumber of
Nodes
Element Type
A1st order hexahedral245Standard
B2nd order hexahedral515Standard
C1st order tetrahedral2094Standard
D2nd order tetrahedral14939Standard
Table 1: Mesh details for each case

The tetrahedral meshes were computed using SimScale’s standard mesh algorithm and automatic sizing. The hexahedral meshes were generated in SimScale with extrusion refinements to obtain a hexahedral mesh.

hexahedral mesh validation case hollow sphere power release
Figure 2: Finite hexahedral elements mesh used on cases A and B
tetrahedral mesh validation case hollow sphere power release
Figure 3: Finite tetrahedral elements mesh used on cases C and D

Simulation Setup

Material:

  • Density \( \rho = \) 1 \( kg/m^3 \)
  • Thermal conductivity \( \kappa = \) 1 \( W/(m.K) \)
  • Specific heat \( C_p = \) 1 \( J/(kg.K) \)

Boundary Conditions:

  • Constraints:
    • Fixed temperature of 20 \(°C\) on faces ABCD and EFGH (internal and external respectively)
    • Volume heat source of 100 \(W/m^3\) on the whole volume.

Reference Solution

The reference solution is of the analytical type, as presented in [TPLV06]\(^1\), originally from [VPCS]\(^2\):

$$ T = T_i + \frac{Q}{6\kappa} \Bigg[ \frac{ (R_e^2 – R_i^2 ) \Big[ \frac{1}{R_i} – \frac{1}{r} \Big] }{ \Big[ \frac{1}{R_i} – \frac{1}{R_e} \Big] } – ( r^2 – R_i^2 ) \Bigg] $$

$$ T_i = 20\ °C $$

$$ Q = 100\ W/m^3 $$

$$ \kappa = 1\ W/(m.K) $$

$$ R_i = 1.0\ m $$

$$ R_e = 2.0\ m $$

The reference solution will be taken at points \( r = \) 1.25, 1.5 and 1.75 \(m\):

$$ T(r = 1.25) = 30.625\ °C $$

$$ T(r = 1.5) = 32.500\ °C $$

$$ T(r = 1.75) = 28.482\ °C $$

Result Comparison

Comparison of temperatures at radii \( R = \) 1.25, 1.5 and 1.75 \(m\) with the reference solution is presented:

CASER
\([m]\)
COMPUTED
\([K]\)
COMPUTED
\([°C]\)
REFERENCE
\([°C]\)
ERROR
A1.25303.66030.51030.625-0.38 %
1.5305.54032.39032.500-0.34 %
1.75301.56828.41828.482-0.23 %
B1.25303.77430.62430.625-0.00 %
1.5305.64932.49932.500-0.00 %
1.75301.63228.48228.4820.00 %
C1.25303.69930.54930.625-0.25 %
1.5305.57632.42632.500-0.23 %
1.75301.59728.44728.482-0.12 %
D1.25303.77630.62630.6250.00 %
1.5305.6532.532.5000.00 %
1.75301.63228.48228.4820.00 %
Table 2: Results comparison and computed errors for cases A through D

Illustration of the temperature distribution from the release of power simulation, case D:

temperature plot validation case hollow sphere power release
Figure 4: Temperature distribution on the body from case D

Tutorial: Thermal Analysis of a Differential Casing

References

Note

If you still encounter problems validating you simulation, then please post the issue on our forum or contact us.

Last updated: April 3rd, 2026

Contents