Fixes #210 and some refactoring #214
Closed
+93
−84
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update with Master
…t(), handleMessages if/elif statement uses a dictionary, json.loads(line) is no longer with a bare except
Contributor
|
I would need to do extensive testing before allowing a refactor because the last time I allowed one it broke things in subtle ways that were hard to detect and track down. I do not currently have time for this at present so I will leave this PR open for now. |
Et0h
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2019
Contributor
|
Hopefully resolved now by fb9b3ce. |
albertosottile
pushed a commit
to albertosottile/syncplay
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2019
…play#214 by xNinjaKittyx)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes Bug #210 by not crashing, and spits out a message "Not a utf-8 string"
Took the liberty to generally refactor
protocols.pyin two ways.I noticed one for loop that used the
for key, value in dict.items():, which I then applied to all for loops where applicable.dict['key'] if key in dict else Nonepattern has been changed todict.get('key')and ifNoneis something else like0then you will seedict.get('key', 0)Edit: Would also like to mention that this should improve performance slightly since it'll only do a lookup in the dict once instead of twice.
I also changed handleMessages to use a dict instead of a series of if/elif/else. It takes a more EAFP approach and makes it a little easier to read in my opinion. Let me know if you like or dislike the change.
Tested it working in a Python 3.6 environment (server + 2 clients)