refactor: optimize AnteHandler gas consumption

[Vvaradinov]

Description

This PR aims to optimize gas consumption by reordering AnteHandlers by executing stateless ones first followed by stateful ones. Additionally it provides specific getters for each individual parameter in the keeper and only calls ones needed by the particular AnteHandler.

Closes: ENG-905 ENG-444

---

For contributor use:

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards.
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer

---

For admin use:

• Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. WIP, R4R, docs, etc)
• Reviewers assigned
• Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1388 (1ba4ac8) into main (5879750) will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 98.18%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1388      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.88%   56.00%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         108      108              
  Lines       10021    10049      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits         5600     5628      +28     
  Misses       4140     4140              
  Partials      281      281              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
app/ante/eth.go	80.16% <94.73%> (+0.10%)	⬆️
app/ante/fee_market.go	76.00% <100.00%> (ø)
app/ante/fees.go	96.84% <100.00%> (ø)
app/ante/handler_options.go	79.45% <100.00%> (ø)
x/evm/keeper/params.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
x/feemarket/keeper/params.go	89.28% <100.00%> (+2.92%)	⬆️

[danburck]

@Vvaradinov nice work!

Can you add

• unit tests for the getters and
• an entry in the CHANGELOG.md?

[fedekunze]

LGTM!

[danburck]

nice @Vvaradinov, I reviewed the changes and left a nit comment. Feel free to merge

[facs95]

The reason why we were calling the params as a set in the places I pointed out was not to make the query several time per property and per message. I liked the idea of making the code cleaner but maybe we can find a way in which is clear but keeps same - or better performance