[codex] Restore setup helper UAC manifest#25949
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fcb44d6320
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
fcb44d6 to
6bd3a19
Compare
zm-oai
approved these changes
Jun 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
#23764 removed Windows resource stamping from
codex-windows-sandbox, but it also removed the setup helper's UAC manifest. That manifest was doing more than cosmetic version metadata: Microsoft documentsrequestedExecutionLevel level="asInvoker"as the setting that makes an executable run at the same permission level as the process that started it: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/sbscs/application-manifests#trustinfoIn the reported session,
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.exewas launched for a non-elevated setup refresh andCreateProcessfailed withos error 740(The requested operation requires elevation). Restoring an explicitasInvokermanifest records the helper's intended default launch contract: normal launches inherit the caller's token, and elevation only happens through the code paths that request it explicitly.The setup helper has two launch modes:
Command::new(...)spawn and should never trigger UACShellExecuteExWwith therunasverb when elevation is requiredRestoring
asInvokerkeeps refresh non-elevated by default while preserving the explicit elevated path for full setup.What changed
codex-windows-sandbox-setup.manifestcontaining onlyrequestedExecutionLevel level="asInvoker".This does not restore
winres,FileDescription,ProductName, or package-wide resource stamping, so other Codex binaries that linkcodex-windows-sandboxdo not inherit metadata from this package.Verification
cargo fmt -p codex-windows-sandboxcargo build -p codex-windows-sandbox --bin codex-windows-sandbox-setupcargo build -p codex-windows-sandbox --bin codex-command-runnercargo build -p codex-windows-sandbox --libCARGO_CFG_TARGET_ENV=msvcemits/MANIFEST:EMBEDand/MANIFESTINPUT:<manifest>.CARGO_CFG_TARGET_ENV=gnu+CARGO_CFG_TARGET_ABI=llvmemits-Wl,-Xlink=/manifest:embedand-Wl,-Xlink=/manifestinput:<manifest>.codex-windows-sandbox-setup.execontainsrequestedExecutionLevel/asInvokercodex-command-runner.exedoes not contain those manifest stringsVersionInforemains blank forFileDescription/ProductNamejust test -p codex-windows-sandboxran through Nextest, with 114 passing, 2 skipped, and 1 existing Windows sandbox failure:unified_exec::tests::legacy_non_tty_cmd_emits_outputfails withCreateRestrictedToken failed: 87.