Skip to content

ui: Potential fix for the occasional time range validation error: End: start timestamp must be before end.#5711

Merged
manojVivek merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
date-range-fix
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

ui: Potential fix for the occasional time range validation error: End: start timestamp must be before end.#5711
manojVivek merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
date-range-fix

Conversation

@manojVivek
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The theory being the older NOW(already evaluated) instance being used in place of to in these onChange callbacks leading to a to that is older than the from which is evaluated freshly.

We'll have to observe over time and see if this really fixes this bug scenario.

@manojVivek manojVivek requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2025 10:11
@alwaysmeticulous
Copy link
Copy Markdown

alwaysmeticulous Bot commented Jun 19, 2025

✅ Meticulous spotted visual differences in 7 of 542 screens tested, but all differences have already been approved: view differences detected.

Meticulous evaluated ~4 hours of user flows against your PR.

Last updated for commit 07e514e. This comment will update as new commits are pushed.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yomete yomete left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤞🏾

@manojVivek manojVivek merged commit f7b21a7 into main Jun 19, 2025
38 checks passed
@manojVivek manojVivek deleted the date-range-fix branch June 19, 2025 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants