Skip to content

Conversation

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

@pradyunsg pradyunsg commented Mar 11, 2022

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member Author

x-ref #31819, which is closely related.

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member Author

If someone wants to validate the file I've added here, you can download it directly from GitHub 1 and verify that the hash matches what's on PyPI. Or... You can trust that I'm not trying to inject malicious code into CPython. :)

Footnotes

  1. https://github.com/python/cpython/raw/08348748df285e31172496c65cc0191896c6630c/Lib/ensurepip/_bundled/setuptools-60.9.3-py3-none-any.whl

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member Author

pradyunsg commented Mar 12, 2022

IIUC, we should probably backport this all the way down to 3.9.

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member Author

@JelleZijlstra Could you label this one as well?

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @pradyunsg for the PR, and @ned-deily for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @pradyunsg and @ned-deily, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.10 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c99ac3c364ee21be72263791b71ee8b55f64de08 3.10

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @pradyunsg and @ned-deily, I had trouble checking out the 3.9 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c99ac3c364ee21be72263791b71ee8b55f64de08 3.9

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @pradyunsg and @ned-deily, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.8 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c99ac3c364ee21be72263791b71ee8b55f64de08 3.8

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @pradyunsg and @ned-deily, I had trouble checking out the 3.7 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c99ac3c364ee21be72263791b71ee8b55f64de08 3.7

@ned-deily ned-deily added needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes labels Mar 13, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @pradyunsg for the PR, and @ned-deily for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Mar 13, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-31853 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @pradyunsg for the PR, and @ned-deily for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @pradyunsg and @ned-deily, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.9 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c99ac3c364ee21be72263791b71ee8b55f64de08 3.9

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-31855 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-31860 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-31861 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @ned-deily for the merge, and for handling the backport merge conflicts! ^>^

@pradyunsg pradyunsg deleted the setuptools-60-9-3-upgrade branch March 14, 2022 07:27
@ned-deily
Copy link
Member

Alas, this version of setuptools introduces some test failures when used with an installed Python so I've reverted this update on all current branches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants