In stories that I hope are going to spread around the blogosphere, and break in the media rather more extensively than they already have, and start a real debate on the use of this kind of tactics, this one is wonderful.
Within activist circles, people have been pretty much certain since Quebec City at least that at least a substantial number of the truly violent protesters who "mar" demonstrations are in fact undercover police provocateurs, based on a number of factors -- the fact that nobody ever knows who they are, that often people who have been seen instigating violent acts never have charges pressed against them, and that nebulous feel that can never quite be substantiated.
But at Montebello, they screwed up. Showing up at a peaceful union protest line with rocks, some of these goons were confronted by Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy, and Paperworkers Union, who insisted that this was a peaceful protest and they should leave. When they kept trying to push through to attack the cops, some actual anarchists showed up, saying that they recognized these people, and that they were police agents, at which point Coles started to question them, asking them to take off their masks for photos. Their reactions throughout this, all captured on video, are - to put it mildly - not what I would expect from any of the Black Bloc types I know. Finally, after chatting for a bit with the riot cops, they "charge" the police lines, and are promptly arrested -- but, as the CP stories linked at the top point out, no charges are laid against any of them.
But where it becomes truly, hilariously fishy is in the wonderful photos that my colleague Sebastien managed to take of them being arrested by the police, some of which have already started floating around the Internet. It's actually a little less clear in the version I've seen online than in the originals, but still visible -- the "protesters" being arrested are wearing (all three of them) exactly the same issue boots that the "police" arresting them are wearing; they've simply throwing some duct tape on them to make them look "anarchist chic." Particularly noticeable are the yellow triangles of the ANSI certification on all of the boots.

Edit: There's a really nice photo with zooming in that shows the identical sole patterns on the boots.
Coles and the CEP are holding a press conference this afternoon, and I'm really hoping that this becomes the story -- a state so afraid of legitimate, peaceful dissent that they will initiate violence that can be used to justify repression. So if there's anywhere on the Net that any of you can help spread this story to -- and it's already moving fairly quickly -- I'd deeply appreciate it.
Within activist circles, people have been pretty much certain since Quebec City at least that at least a substantial number of the truly violent protesters who "mar" demonstrations are in fact undercover police provocateurs, based on a number of factors -- the fact that nobody ever knows who they are, that often people who have been seen instigating violent acts never have charges pressed against them, and that nebulous feel that can never quite be substantiated.
But at Montebello, they screwed up. Showing up at a peaceful union protest line with rocks, some of these goons were confronted by Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy, and Paperworkers Union, who insisted that this was a peaceful protest and they should leave. When they kept trying to push through to attack the cops, some actual anarchists showed up, saying that they recognized these people, and that they were police agents, at which point Coles started to question them, asking them to take off their masks for photos. Their reactions throughout this, all captured on video, are - to put it mildly - not what I would expect from any of the Black Bloc types I know. Finally, after chatting for a bit with the riot cops, they "charge" the police lines, and are promptly arrested -- but, as the CP stories linked at the top point out, no charges are laid against any of them.
But where it becomes truly, hilariously fishy is in the wonderful photos that my colleague Sebastien managed to take of them being arrested by the police, some of which have already started floating around the Internet. It's actually a little less clear in the version I've seen online than in the originals, but still visible -- the "protesters" being arrested are wearing (all three of them) exactly the same issue boots that the "police" arresting them are wearing; they've simply throwing some duct tape on them to make them look "anarchist chic." Particularly noticeable are the yellow triangles of the ANSI certification on all of the boots.

Edit: There's a really nice photo with zooming in that shows the identical sole patterns on the boots.
Coles and the CEP are holding a press conference this afternoon, and I'm really hoping that this becomes the story -- a state so afraid of legitimate, peaceful dissent that they will initiate violence that can be used to justify repression. So if there's anywhere on the Net that any of you can help spread this story to -- and it's already moving fairly quickly -- I'd deeply appreciate it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 05:53 pm (UTC)It's also interesting that "Montebello's mayor praised both police and protesters after hundreds of officers and more than a thousand activists descended on the Quebec town for a summit by the three North American leaders — without a single report of damage." (http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/story/2007/08/22/montebello-after.html?ref=rss).
It sure sounds like incitement to me.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 05:58 pm (UTC)Posted to my blog.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 09:42 pm (UTC)(Posted to my lj before I read it here!)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 01:28 am (UTC)(Leather Personnel Carriers.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-22 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 03:35 am (UTC)Disgusting.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 01:32 pm (UTC)Am I paranoid or what?!
Date: 2007-08-23 03:30 pm (UTC)I feel good to be canning the garden produce this summer, we may need it.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 05:14 pm (UTC)Blegh!
no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-23 10:41 pm (UTC)I wonder if that conspicuously weird green paint on the guy's shoes was a recognition signal.
The boots gave it away
Date: 2007-08-24 02:14 am (UTC)Police said the three were told to monitor protesters who were not peacefully demonstrating to prevent any violent incidents, but they were called out as undercover agents when they refused to throw objects.
Ha ha.
(I guess next time they'll make sure to wear different boots.)
Re: The boots gave it away
Date: 2007-08-24 02:19 am (UTC)Re: The boots gave it away
Date: 2007-08-24 06:42 pm (UTC)I wondered how they were going to stick with their story given that it blatantly conflicted with the videotape that anyone can look up on the internet.
Re: The boots gave it away
Date: 2007-09-04 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 10:40 pm (UTC)"The protesters made me take the rock."
<*Sigh*>
no subject
Date: 2007-08-24 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-25 12:40 am (UTC)Congrats, your post is on http://cryptome.org/!
Pro-Peace
Date: 2007-08-26 02:46 pm (UTC)"Cruel and Unusual Creature", Final Solution again ?
Funny old world
Date: 2007-08-26 09:08 pm (UTC)Looking at the video film and the apparently small number of genuine protestors, why were the Canadian police already in riot control kit? Has there been a history of violence at SPP protests, or is it displaying such equipment that deters / prevents disorder?
Then you see on the video many genuine and young protestors wearing masks. If this was a peaceful protest why wear a mask? In Germany it is an offence to wear a mask at a protest and is widely acknowledged as a sign of trouble ahead.
The police attempt at protest escalation is weird, who authorised this?
From a copper in the UK.
mexico
Date: 2007-08-28 06:11 pm (UTC)secret group in mexico during the 68 student protests that resulted
in the famously covered up tlatelolco massacre.
the idiots can't even come up with something original..
i dont think they had the money for the same brand boots back then..
The Boots
Date: 2007-08-30 02:48 pm (UTC)Do your homework !
Re: The Boots
Date: 2007-08-31 09:14 pm (UTC)As cited several times above, the police eventually admitted that the three were undercover officers. After initially denying it.
Reading comprehension much?
(No, the boots didn't prove anything, but it was implausible that all three random unknown violence-inciting "protesters" would just happen to have exactly the same boot type as the police...)
Re: The Boots
Date: 2007-09-04 06:35 pm (UTC)Since the overt Police are in uniform, it's a fair bet that they're wearing the same design of boot, and you can build up a composite picture of the identifying features. It's not just details of the soles: for instance, is there something about the way the Police lace their boots?
The line between being undercover and provoking is often uncertain. In the UK, there have been cases where relatively young cops were picked to infiltrate gangs of football hooligans--they had to be young to match the thugs--and their lack of experience ruined several cases because of possible incitement.
Re: The Boots
Date: 2007-09-07 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-03 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-21 02:56 pm (UTC)I add you to my reading list (I loathe the word friends).
Too Obvious
Date: 2007-10-08 01:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 05:03 am (UTC)TK
no subject
Date: 2008-09-03 07:20 am (UTC)The events in the Twin Cities sort of beg the reference, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-04 02:02 pm (UTC)