Log inSign up
Mark Elliott
7,940 posts
Image
user avatar
Mark Elliott
@ProfMarkElliott
Professor of Public Law, University of Cambridge. Fellow, St Catharine's College, Cambridge. Author of publiclawforeveryone.com
Cambridge, UK
markelliott.org
Joined July 2012
420
Following
33.9K
Followers
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jun 15, 2022
    Partygate-related resignations by officials: 1. Allegra Stratton, Govt spokesperson 2. John Penrose, Govt 'anti-corruption tsar' 3. Lord Geidt, Independent Adviser on Ministerial Standards Resignations so far by politicians under doctrine of ministerial responsibility: None
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Sep 10, 2020
    Attorney General @SuellaBraverman still hasn’t resigned, but she has broken her recent silence on the Internal Market Bill by publishing a statement of HM Government’s ‘legal position’ on it. It runs to one side of A4. And it is utterly risible. /1 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
    Image
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jun 28, 2022
    Here's my interview with @mrjamesob about the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill.
    user avatar
    LBC
    @LBC
    Jun 28, 2022
    'This is one of the most remarkable interviews I've ever conducted!'  James O'Brien is blown away as Professor Mark Elliott explains why the Government lacks legal authority to dump the Northern Ireland protocol.  @mrjamesob | @ProfMarkElliott
    Image
    00:00
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jul 12, 2022
    I find this concerning, since it undermines the constitutional principle that the Government must be able to command the confidence of the House of Commons: a principle that requires the Opposition, when appropriate, to be able to test that confidence via a vote. /1
    user avatar
    Pippa Crerar
    The Guardian
    @PippaCrerar
    Jul 12, 2022
    BREAKING: Boris Johnson has blocked Labour's bid to hold vote of no confidence in Govt tomorrow Senior Labour source: "It's just another example of them ripping up the rules to protect their own side. They're saying he's going anyway but they're clearly frightened of losing".
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Feb 11, 2022
    Implication that Police should think more carefully before issuing someone with a fixed penality because they're the PM is abhorrent to the rule of law. 'Every man, whatever be his rank or condition, is subject to the ordinary law of the realm' (Dicey) x.com/paul__johnson/…
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Sep 10, 2020
    Replying to @ProfMarkElliott
    The UK may have left the EU, but it has not left the community of nations or the rules-based international order. Treaty obligations are binding upon the UK, and to suggest that they are not ‘because Parliament is sovereign’ is as embarrassing as it is dangerous. /ends
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Sep 10, 2020
    I see Attorney-General @SuellaBraverman & Lord Chancellor @RobertBuckland still haven't resigned from a Government intent on undermining the rule of law. I was going to say that's quite extraordinary — but it's now just par for the course. Not a political point. Just a fact.
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jun 20, 2022
    Extraordinary. A Cabinet Minister—in conversation with the PM's sister—boasting about her ignorance of the system for upholding the Ministerial Code, trivialising Lord Geidt's resignation & implying that standards in public life are an elite concern.
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Sep 3, 2019
    I'm pleased to be a signatory to this letter to the Times. We argue that the recent decision to prorogue Parliament sets a dangerous precedent and is incompatible with the core UK constitutional principle of executive accountability to Parliament.
    Image
    Image
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jul 11, 2022
    There are 3 fundamental problems with this. First, it implies being bound by treaty obligations is incompatible with sovereignty, whereas entering into such obligations is actually an exercise of sovereignty. Sovereignty is a resource to be used, not a relic to be venerated. /1
    user avatar
    Suella Braverman
    @SuellaBraverman
    Jul 11, 2022
    We must restore full UK sovereignty and safeguard the Belfast Agreement. That means dealing with the Northern Ireland Protocol #Suella4leader
    Image
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jul 10, 2022
    What is ‘elite’ about pointing out that @SuellaBraverman is advocating two entirely inconsistent policies, and that each of them would involve breaches of international law? If ‘making sense’ and ‘obeying the law’ are now elitist, we really are in deep trouble.
    user avatar
    M.
    @maw6785
    Jul 10, 2022
    The elite are going feral. Keep up the good work @SuellaBraverman
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Sep 2, 2022
    I find this opinion on the Johnson Privileges Committee matter very odd. Much of it is concerned with the fact that the Committee's process may not adhere to legal standards that are wholly inapplicable to a political, parliamentary process. /1 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jul 7, 2022
    Does the PM’s refusal to resign mean the UK is in a ‘constitutional crisis’? That’s a vague notion, but I think the answer is that it implies he’s willing to create one very soon. Another way of framing the question is: At what point *must* Boris Johnson resign? /1
  • user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jul 7, 2022
    Keir Starmer has just told BBC News that if Boris Johnson attempts to stay on pending the leadership election, the Opposition will hold a parliamentary vote of no confidence. That is the proper constitutional mechanism for immediate removal of Johnson as PM, as explained here.
    user avatar
    Mark Elliott
    @ProfMarkElliott
    Jul 7, 2022
    If the leadership election takes several months, such that Johnson would remain PM until October, and if that is considered unacceptable, it would be open for a vote of no confidence to be held in the House of Commons. /1

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
Advertisement
Advertisement