Log inSign up
Stephen Fisher
26.7K posts
Image
user avatar
Stephen Fisher
@SeaSpitfires
Historian, author, @NatGeo & @LindbladExp guide & speaker, @NauticalHistory trustee. Soft spot for D-Day, landing craft & MTBs. Servant to Flynn. Hates AI.
Southampton, UK
seaspitfires.com
Joined September 2016
899
Following
12.6K
Followers
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    May 23, 2024
    Sword Beach, the first detailed study of the British landings at Ouistreham on D-Day, is now available in a range of formats.
    Image
    Sword Beach
    From penguin.co.uk
    90K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 19, 2024
    This is not an attempt to justify what happened at Stonehenge today, or even to change anyone’s mind about it. I’d simply like to add some context that I feel has been missing from some reports, statements and tweets.
    Image
    5.5M
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 19, 2024
    Replying to @SeaSpitfires
    I’m not interested in the politics of the incident, but I’m faintly amused by the outcry as if this sort of protest-vandalism has never happened at Stonehenge before. It has, more often than you might think.
    Image
    763K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 20, 2024
    Replying to @realMattToomer
    No, it's a comment on the archaeological impact on the stones. It's not trying to justify anything.
    314K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 19, 2024
    Replying to @SeaSpitfires
    3 stones have been impacted, from L to R in the above image they are numbers 23, 22 & 21. They are sarsen stones, a type of sandstone and whilst they are porous, the substance thrown at them was apparently cornflour. The stones are not in any danger, nor are any carvings on them.
    Readers added context they thought people might want to knowReaders added context
    If rain had come into contact with the powder, damage could have been significant. The stones are covered in more than fifty different lichens, some of them rare. This meant brushing or washing the paint off was not possible. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
    Context is written by people who use X, and appears when rated helpful by others. Find out more.
    506K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 20, 2024
    Replying to @JasperWaale
    No, it's a comment on the archaeological impact on the stones. It's not trying to justify anything.
    266K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 19, 2024
    Replying to @SeaSpitfires
    … accessible. As a result few lichens survive below head height because people were touching the stones. Indeed the lichens will suffer far more damage tomorrow night as thousands of festival goers press themselves into the circle.
    Image
    455K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jul 10, 2024
    Wartime photos can tell us so much about how the average infantryman was equipped on D-Day. For instance, knowing the dimensions of a Bergen rucksack, we can work out how big this bulge is. So we can tell that this commandos was equipped with an iPhone 9.
    Image
    154K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 19, 2024
    Replying to @SeaSpitfires
    To do this, the stones were wrapped in metal frames and steel hawsers. A far more abrasive material than cornflour. What about the lichens? As you can see most of the cornflour has fallen on bare stone. This is because until the early 80s, the stone circle was totally…
    Image
    452K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 19, 2024
    Replying to @SeaSpitfires
    The stones have also suffered far worse. 23 and 22 were both re-erected in the 1960s, 23 after it mysteriously fell over a few years after it was whacked by 22 when it was itself being hoisted up by a crane. The lintel above 22 and 21 was similarly replaced by a crane.
    Image
    511K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Apr 9, 2021
    RIP His Royal Highness Prince Philip. Prince Philip's war service is usually summarised as getting a Mention in Despatches at the Battle of Cape Matapan and saving HMS Wallace at Sicily. But I feel this overlooks so much more, and occasionally errors creep in, so here we go.
    Image
    Image
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 20, 2024
    Replying to @guektiengieline
    I'm sure they will, but that's not the point of my thread.
    109K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Jun 20, 2024
    You've got it.
    81K
  • user avatar
    Stephen Fisher
    @SeaSpitfires
    Dec 5, 2022
    I've recently seen some very questionable archaeology. I don't like politics and happily respect that different people have different views, but on this occasion it has to be said that there is a rise in far-right attacks on the profession, so I want to highlight some examples.
    Image

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
Advertisement
Advertisement