"We decided that the disappearance of five people should dominate news reports (because they were wealthy) and the readers disagreed with our priorities. HOW DARE THEY."
To give a sense of the scale of citation market - how many people are paying brokers to get their shabby papers cited (& to elevate their academic metrices) - here's a review paper where the last *4½ pages* are a stream of absurd, irrelevant references.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Kirsch: "Here's my unqualified opinion. Prove me wrong if you can! Otherwise my opinion is proven!"
Also Kirsch: Blocks everyone who offers to prove him wrong.
I suspect that van Maerlant had seen a snail. There is a long tradition of snail hybrids in illuminated manuscript marginalia.
One of these is not from a medieval manuscript.
"We are falling between two stools," my co-author lamented in an e-mail.
"Even worse," I wrote back, confident in the knowledge that she cannot thump me all the way from Liverpool. "We are stalling between two fools."
Things go horribly wrong when authors have contracted with Elsevier to deliver a book on tidal energy and don't have time to notice that the sources of their plagiarism are writing non-literally.
pubpeer.com/publications/E…worldenergy.org/assets/downloa…