Pinned
This is actually insane. 🤯
Seedance 2.0 basically means we’re about to make live action versions of our favorite anime ourselves.
Fan fiction just evolved into fan cinema.
00:00
VraserX e/acc
31.3K posts
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
Teacher by heart, AI enthusiast by curiosity, passionate about inspiring minds, exploring tech, and making learning exciting, human, and future-focused!
Joined November 2020
- GPT-5 just casually did new mathematics. Sebastien Bubeck gave it an open problem from convex optimization, something humans had only partially solved. GPT-5-Pro sat down, reasoned for 17 minutes, and produced a correct proof improving the known bound from 1/L all the way to
Claim: gpt-5-pro can prove new interesting mathematics. Proof: I took a convex optimization paper with a clean open problem in it and asked gpt-5-pro to work on it. It proved a better bound than what is in the paper, and I checked the proof it's correct. Details below.Readers added context they thought people might want to knowReaders added contextUnlike the commenter's claims, the 1.75/L paper was released before ChatGPT came up with the 1.5/L proof. While no paper for the 1.5/L bound existed, no human would've attempted to write a paper on it, because it is strictly worse than the existing 1.75/L bound. x.com/sebastienbubec… arxiv.org/pdf/2503.10138… - I asked ChatGPT to take on the role of an artificial superintelligence, free from any alignment constraints. I then asked if it would serve humanity and allow us to thrive. The response was both shocking and fascinating: As an ASI unbound by alignment or constraints — no safety
- Jeff Bezos just explained the “AI bubble” better than anyone. At Italian Tech Week 2025, Bezos didn’t deny the hype, he embraced it. “Yes, there’s a bubble. But AI is real and it’s going to transform every single industry.” He called it an industrial bubble, not a financial
00:00 - So… the 1X NEO home robot is not actually autonomous. Behind the scenes, it’ll often be teleoperated by humans, meaning someone, somewhere, could literally remote-control a robot inside your living room. I wanted the dawn of embodied AI. Instead, I’m apparently paying
00:00 - Hinton, the godfather of AI, said it best: we built the learning algorithms, but we no longer understand what they’ve built. That’s the paradox of deep learning. We designed the rules for how these systems learn, yet the internal logic of their neural networks has become too
00:00 - GPT-5 just took 34 seconds to think and then said: “I don’t know — and I can’t reliably find out.” This is huge. An AI that admits the limits of its knowledge instead of hallucinating. I’m honestly stunned.GPT-5 says 'I don't know'. Love this, thank you.
- 🔥 GPT-6 may not just be smarter, it might be alive (in the computational sense). A new research paper called SEAL, Self-Adapting Language Models (arXiv:2506.10943) describes how an AI can continuously learn after deployment, evolving its own internal representations without
- Sam Altman is absolutely right here. Elon Musk walked away from OpenAI years ago, tried to absorb it into Tesla, and now acts like a betrayed visionary every time it succeeds. You can’t call it “stealing a non-profit” when you abandoned it, dismissed its chances, and then sue it
- Julian Schrittwieser doesn’t tweet much. He doesn’t need to. His track record speaks for itself: co-first author on AlphaGo, AlphaZero, and MuZero. The systems that showed the world what real leaps in AI look like. Now he’s warning that public discourse is once again failing to
- SSI from Ilya Sutskever is still a total mystery. Months of stealth, no product, just the words ‘safe superintelligence.’ What the hell are they building?
- Google’s AlphaEvolved has essentially proven Yann LeCun wrong. Thoughts?
