Log inSign up
Ben Golub
8,442 posts
Image
user avatar
Ben Golub
@ben_golub
econ prof @NorthwesternU, co-founder at refine.ink studying networks past: @Harvard | @Stanford'12 | @Caltech '07
Chicago, IL
bengolub.net
Joined June 2011
3,137
Following
68.2K
Followers
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Oct 23, 2025
    I am super excited to share a new AI tool, Refine. Refine thoroughly studies research papers like a referee and finds issues with correctness, clarity, and consistency. In my own papers, it regularly catches problems that my coauthors and I missed. 1/
    Image
    469K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Jan 20, 2021
    Image
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    May 9, 2025
    First eigenpope
    user avatar
    Leonardo Rizzo
    @LnrdRizzo
    May 9, 2025
    How we "guessed" the Pope using network science: inside the cardinal network. A study by me, Beppe Soda and Alessandro Iorio. Article: unibocconi.it/en/news/networ… @Unibocconi
    Image
    140K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Feb 2, 2025
    Modern supply chains don't look like trade theory 101! They involve constant border crossings, each now hit by tariffs. Tariffs raise prices, but the more important thing they do is disrupt supply relationships. 1/ graphic h/t @scottlincicome .
    Image
    388K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Nov 11, 2024
    Eigenvalues are amazing. (Please like if you can see this.)
    78K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Jan 10, 2025
    but yeah let's read Marx and chat about him, seems like the best use of time
    user avatar
    Johan Norberg
    @johanknorberg
    Jan 8, 2025
    India’s performance before and after the start of economic liberalization in 1991, via @martinwolf_
    Image
    277K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    May 9, 2025
    Did they preregister this?!?!?
    user avatar
    Leonardo Rizzo
    @LnrdRizzo
    May 9, 2025
    How we "guessed" the Pope using network science: inside the cardinal network. A study by me, Beppe Soda and Alessandro Iorio. Article: unibocconi.it/en/news/networ… @Unibocconi
    Image
    336K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Apr 17, 2025
    It's a provocative thesis, but also completely devoid of empirical backing or clear economic reasoning. C-minus work.
    user avatar
    Bryan Caplan
    @bryan_caplan
    Apr 17, 2025
    In the long-run, even cuts to STEM funding are very good. Top STEM researchers belong in industry, not academia.
    131K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Apr 9, 2025
    Macroeconomics is the natural predator of foolish regimes.
    67K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Jan 4, 2025
    Randomly reminded of the experience of telling a, say, history student you study economics and their utter surprise at the fact that you haven't worked through Smith and Marx.
    2M
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Jan 3, 2022
    I wish people at Google could get promotions in some way that wouldn't involve large, arbitrary changes in my phone's interface
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Sep 21, 2024
    Replying to @JosephNWalker and @nntaleb
    A negative probability (which Taleb discusses here) is the likelihood of learning anything from this word salad
    375K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Apr 4, 2025
    The main effect of tariff insanity: Uncertainty poisoning supply networks, degrading a lot of relationships at once. That scar tissue will linger for a long time. 1/
    184K
  • user avatar
    Ben Golub
    @ben_golub
    Nov 4, 2024
    I have a good friend who really respects Nate but he is having a hard time standing up for him. Running lots of random regressions (with non-robust standard errors) and reporting one in this way is the stuff of bad undergraduate term papers !
    user avatar
    Nate Silver
    @NateSilver538
    Nov 3, 2024
    Replying to @NateSilver538
    There are some confounders here, but the inflation thing is actually statistically significant! Each additional $100 of inflation in a state since January 2021 predicts a further 1.6 swing against Harris in our polling average vs. the Biden-Trump margin in 2020.
    Image
    139K

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms of Service|Privacy Policy|Cookie Policy|Accessibility|Ads info|© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
Advertisement
Advertisement