Pinned
Mammography-induced cancers. First publication in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Daniel Corcos
47.3K posts
Daniel Corcos
@daniel_corcos
MD, PhD
Mammography-induced cancers
Medical science whistleblower
youtu.be/f9lG96pydZ4
video.lanceurs-alerte.fr/w/x5XiUCZ7GftD…
- The Fraud of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis This thread is the most comprehensive and educational I've done on the subject. If you find it valuable, please RT. 🧵
- En 2018, l'année où j'ai été renvoyé de l'@Inserm pour la découverte des cancers causés par les mammographies, toute la médecine française était sous la tutelle du couple Lévy-Buzyn, Lévy étant lui-même sous la tutelle criminelle de Fauci. 1/Le directeur d'Aviesan était Yves Lévy, également directeur de l'@Inserm. Il était à la tête de toute la recherche médicale française (Inserm + CNRS). Il avait été mis en place à cette position grâce au soutien de Fauci x.com/daniel_corcos/…, un criminel. 1/
- Fil sur mon renvoi de l’@Inserm pour la découverte des cancers causés par les mammographies par Yves Lévy, l’ami de Fauci. Ce dernier était à la tête de la biodéfense américaine et c'est à lui nous devons la pandémie de Covid qui a fait des millions de morts. 🧵 1/
- Replying to @daniel_corcosThere were two ways to explain the increase: 1) Mammography detected cancers that would never have manifested (overdiagnosis). 2) Mammography itself created cancers because of X-rays.
- Replying to @daniel_corcosThe second explanation seemed excluded. Why? Because a commission of experts supervised by the U.S. military had evaluated that the risk associated with the radiation dose used for a mammogram was harmless. There is no data to support this claim; on the contrary.
- Replying to @daniel_corcosAmerican women ended up with a higher risk of having breast cancer over their lifetime than before screening. The same increase was observed in all countries that have used mammography screening.
- Replying to @daniel_corcosIn reality, the cancer risks associated with the medical use of X-rays had been identified as early as the late 1960s by John Gofman, who was in charge of studying the biological effects of radiation at the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
- Replying to @daniel_corcosThe implementation of the mammography screening program in the US was accompanied by a significant increase in the incidence of breast cancer. This is not surprising, as the goal of screening is to detect cancers years in advance.
- La fraude du surdiagnostic du cancer du sein. 🧵 Ce fil est le plus complet et le plus didactique que j'ai réalisé sur le sujet. Sa version anglaise à obtenu plus de 2 millions de vues. Si vous le trouvez utile, merci de RT.
- Replying to @daniel_corcosThe problem is that this incidence has never returned to its initial level, far from it. However this should have occurred if it were simply a matter of advancing the diagnosis.
- Replying to @daniel_corcosLater, in 1995, after gathering substantial evidence, Gofman published a book on the risk of radiation and breast cancer, which achieved some success but was met with complete silence from medical and scientific journals, except for negative reviews. ratical.org/radiation/CNR/…
- Replying to @daniel_corcosTowards the late 1990s, information emerged that should have served as a warning: mammography screening had not reduced breast cancer mortality in Sweden.
