Where do people think top STEM researchers are trained?
In the long-run, even cuts to STEM funding are very good. Top STEM researchers belong in industry, not academia.
Maya Sen
2,028 posts
Maya Sen
@maya_sen
Joined January 2010
- Informing a private entity it will no longer be eligible for government contracts in part because a Democrat sits on its board
- My take is a bit different - admissions to elite universities have over time put more and more weight on extracurriculars So, there should be no surprise when these admitted students then get to college and devote most of their time to…extracurriculars“Full time” college students spend less than three hours per day in class or doing homework. A downstream consequence of the marketization of higher education — the customers are getting what they want and what they want is easy classes. slowboring.com/p/college-stud…
- No, the market for international students is absolutely not zero sum! People’s brains have been totally cooked by SFA v Harvard and the obsession with undergrad admissions
- Replying to @maya_senNot trying to be glib but I think if we’re going to destroy the productive partnership between government and academic R&D, there should be a compelling alternative model I don’t see it yet
- Harvard ran off its former president for less
- International students aren’t at places like Harvard to provide “diversity” (though they do that) They’re there to provide research firepower and advance knowledge People need to stop applying affirmative action jurisprudence to international students"While foreign students bring one sort of diversity to U.S. universities, it may not be as great as the diversity provided by Americans of different social backgrounds." @DavidAvromBell nytimes.com/2025/06/01/opi…
- Replying to @JDFinRII don’t believe training PhD level scientists would be profitable in the free market at the level & number we’re talking about to maintain US leadership in STEM It’s the kind of thing that requires real policy behind it
- Great reporting here but for all the talk about divestment and transparency, I would hope someone simply asked the Harvard Corporation reps why the Harvard endowment gets a 2.9% rate of return
- Replying to @maya_senwhat’s terrible is that the administration had many natural allies in academia - professors who wanted more diversity in thought, fewer regulations governing research funding, higher & consistent academic standards, and better protections of academic speech But not like this!
- all because Harvard refused to allow the government control over core academic functionsNEW and BREAKING: Another major blow for Harvard -- the Trump administration has essentially revoked Harvard's ability to enroll foreign students by taking away their ability to get visas. w/@MichaelCBender nytimes.com/2025/05/22/us/…
- I wrote a piece for WSJ on the politics of NIH university funding The reactions have been incredibly polarizing - not surprisingly! Realistically I don’t think universities can get back to high indirects any time soon 🧵
- Replying to @SteveDailey33I’m not taking away anything. That’s what the letter says.
