Log inSign up
Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
15.5K posts
Image
user avatar
Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
@oomahq
Running BIP-110🪢 & DATUM🌊 | @BcnBitcoinOnly elder | Activate #OP_DROP_CGT | Distributed Authoritarian | 5 Ph/s home miner of last resort
Joined November 2024
660
Following
2,868
Followers

New to X?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Create account

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Terms·Privacy·Cookies·Accessibility·Ads Info·© 2026 X Corp.
Don't miss what's happening
People on X are the first to know.
Log inSign up
  • Pinned
    user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    May 30
    If you're a Bitcoin noderunner you're much more powerful and sovereign than you probably realize. There is actually very little global hashrate, and it's very cheap to control it with your node. Yesterday at the @bcc8333 conference I brought a @start9labs node that remotely
    Image
    5.8K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    May 2, 2025
    There's a lot of FUD and misconceptions flying around @LukeDashjr's @BitcoinKnots node software, so it's the perfect subject for a thread! 🧵 If you're thinking about dumping Bitcoin Core but you're on the fence because you know nothing about Knots, this thread is for you.
    Image
    48K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Sep 20, 2025
    I don't know who needs to hear this, but node runners matter a lot more than developers. If you think I'm being flippant consider all the shitcoins out there with their millions of developers and ~zero node runners.
    Image
    16K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Oct 8, 2025
    If you only learn one thing about the OP_RETURN drama, make it this: The biggest threat to Bitcoin's censorship resistance is that the biggest pools stop mining on top of blocks found by anyone, and start mining only on top of blocks found by a small cartel of pools. Another
    Image
    user avatar
    Matt Corallo 🟠
    @TheBlueMatt
    Oct 8, 2025
    If you only learn one thing about the OP_RETURN drama, make it this. From a network perspective, the most important risk to Bitcoin’s longevity is mining centralization, by far. Just when we’re on the cusp of making transaction selection decentralized with Braidpool, P2PoolV2,
    27K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Oct 21, 2025
    Thanks for the shout-out Matt, but especially thanks for spreading the word 🫡
    user avatar
    Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110
    @mattkratter
    Oct 21, 2025
    Another Bitcoin Core Smoking Gun
    Image
    00:00
    19K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Jun 1, 2025
    Image
    user avatar
    Erik Voorhees
    Venice
    @ErikVoorhees
    May 31, 2025
    Replying to @DavidFBailey
    The toxic maxis are the absolute worst part of the entire movement. Their allegiance is to brand and idol-worship, not to principle. But Bitcoin is only useful, only virtuous, to the degree it brings its underlying principles into the world. And wherever else those same
    11K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Apr 28, 2025
    Seems like an ol' thread to debunk this nonsense is in order 🧵 Between blocks 877325 (01 Jan 2025) and 894289 (today) there's 30 non-std OP_RETURN txs out of 7 million, or 0.004246903% of the total. That's a 99.995753097% success rate for the 83 byte limit spam filter in 2025.
    Image
    121K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Oct 27, 2025
    I don't know who needs to read this, but the Reduced Data Soft Fork proposal is not in response to inscription spam. It is in response to Core abdicating responsibility to properly steward the reference Bitcoin client.
    6.8K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Oct 1, 2025
    Remember the arbitrariness of the Samourai and Tornado Cash devs prosecutions. If you feel 100000% sure that Bitcoin Core sanctioning large chunks of arbitrary data embedding as an officially supported use case of the Bitcoin network won't have any consequences you're full of
    user avatar
    Nick Szabo
    JAN3
    @NickSzabo4
    Oct 1, 2025
    Replying to @LeeroyBitcoins @phyrooo and 5 others
    You calling it absurd isn't going to influence the lawyers. They have their own precedents and their own ideas. If node operators have knowledge that they are hosting illegal data, they are probably criminally liable in many jurisdictions. (Whether or when prosecutors choose to
    26K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    May 24, 2025
    Throwback to when Bitcoin developers still called bad actors like MARA "adversarial miners" and were worried about witness space being (ab)used to store arbitrary data.
    Image
    9.7K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Jun 4, 2025
    The OP_RETURN thread is way due for an update 🧵 I'm happy to report that the spammers took my challenge seriously and for the month of May (blocks 894655 to 899281) we saw 13325 non-std OP_RETURNs on the chain. That's 443x times what we saw from January to April 2025!
    Image
    Image
    user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Apr 28, 2025
    Seems like an ol' thread to debunk this nonsense is in order 🧵 Between blocks 877325 (01 Jan 2025) and 894289 (today) there's 30 non-std OP_RETURN txs out of 7 million, or 0.004246903% of the total. That's a 99.995753097% success rate for the 83 byte limit spam filter in 2025.
    37K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Sep 22, 2025
    Great banger from mystery shitposter.
    Image
    6K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    Oct 13, 2025
    Weird, I was repeatedly told that it was already possible to mine large OP_RETURNs way before Core v30 was released.
    user avatar
    Electron Arc-20 (₿itcoin) ⚛️
    @Electron_ARC20
    Oct 12, 2025
    🔥 Bitcoin Core v30.0 just opened a new era for metaprotocols on Bitcoin. With this update, OP_RETURN removes the 80-byte limit, allowing multiple data fragments to be emitted within a single transaction. Plus, the minimum relay fee is reduced to 0.1 sat/vB, making it cheaper to
    9.9K
  • user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    May 10, 2025
    This is such a gem from Bitcoin Core's v0.13 release notes that I didn't notice while writing the article. Back in 2016 Bitcoin Core developers recommended pool operators to enforce all common mempool policy to avoid orphan blocks. How things have changed!
    Image
    user avatar
    Extractive Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻
    @oomahq
    May 10, 2025
    I'm doing a stint as a thinkboi with an opinion article, thanks to @EuropeanBTC21 for hosting it. I tried to steelman the developer's PoV for the 80IQ plebs, and make a better case for filters/DATUM than what it's possible on Twitter. Hope you enjoy it. europeanbitcoiners.com/lopp_return-wa…
    34K
Advertisement
Advertisement