Replying to @jk_rowling
Goodness, look at you attacking a group simply based on your own prejudices. Where have we seen that before?
Dr Rachel Saunders
44.6K posts
Dr Rachel Saunders
@rejserin
Researcher. Hockey keeper, devourer of books, doing my own thing. Law PhD, Games Production BSc
- Replying to @jk_rowlingGlamour has always been trans inclusive, and this simply states that trans women are valid, not better.
- Replying to @DobbsandPolicy and @imbethmccollNo you're not though. This is a classic case of transphobic harassment which the ruling explicitly called out as wrong.
- Replying to @OliLondonTVSatire Oli, that thing you seem to have had a bypass of.
- Replying to @Esqueer_This is why you squish far right rhetoric first time, every time.
- Replying to @jk_rowlingTrans women are not men, so to claim otherwise is the height of misogyny.
- Replying to @JDVanceThey are stickers designed to provoke a conversation. It would appear they have had their intended effect.
- Replying to @jk_rowlingHello JK this is metaphor. Trans women are women regardless of whatever metaphors you throw at us.
- Replying to @OliLondonTVHow you dress does not define your sexuality or who you want to be intimate with.
- Replying to @DobbsandPolicy
- Just a reminder that the #CassReport is a grey piece of literature without peer review. It is not medical research and is a policy document based on a political agenda.
- Replying to @andreajenkynsYou are conflating two separate issues that are entirely separate. Sex education is not the same as gender identity or gender expression, and stating they are is disingenuous.
