Skip to content

Conversation

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor

UDP version of #4407

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @saghul @santigimeno

@panjf2000 panjf2000 force-pushed the udp-reuseport branch 2 times, most recently from 5bec9bc to 6ddb837 Compare May 23, 2024 11:19
@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

panjf2000 commented May 23, 2024

This CI failure should have been fixed by #4417

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kindly ping @saghul @santigimeno

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented May 30, 2024

Merged the test update, can you pl rebase?

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged the test update, can you pl rebase?

Done!

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

panjf2000 commented May 30, 2024

A test failure arose:

not ok 51 - fs_event_error_reporting
# exit code 6
# Output from process `fs_event_error_reporting`:
# Assertion failed in /Users/runner/work/libuv/libuv/test/test-fs-event.c on line 1115: `uv_loop_init(loop) == 0` (-24 == 0)

, with which this PR should have nothing to do (hopefully (⊙ˍ⊙))

Copy link
Member

@santigimeno santigimeno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Left a couple of comments.

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Some comments on this? @saghul

@panjf2000 panjf2000 force-pushed the udp-reuseport branch 2 times, most recently from 4220ed3 to e680b8a Compare June 3, 2024 10:34
Copy link
Member

@saghul saghul left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👏

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

It seems like an irrelevant CI failure:

not ok 321 - tcp_oob
# timeout
# Output from process `tcp_oob`: (no output)

Could you rerun the failed runner manually? @saghul

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Jun 3, 2024

It seems like an irrelevant CI failure:

not ok 321 - tcp_oob
# timeout
# Output from process `tcp_oob`: (no output)

Could you rerun the failed runner manually? @saghul

Done.

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great! All checks have passed!
Can we get this PR merged now? @saghul

@saghul
Copy link
Member

saghul commented Jun 3, 2024

Can we get this PR merged now?

We need some more eyes.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andy Pan <i@andypan.me>
@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe @santigimeno wants to take another look at this?

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping @libuv/collaborators

@panjf2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

@santigimeno Could you take a quick look at the latest code changes? Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@santigimeno santigimeno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a couple of non-mandatory nits. Sorry it took this long getting to review this: was very busy. Thanks

---------

Signed-off-by: Andy Pan <i@andypan.me>
---------

Signed-off-by: Andy Pan <i@andypan.me>
---------

Signed-off-by: Andy Pan <i@andypan.me>
@panjf2000 panjf2000 requested a review from santigimeno June 20, 2024 11:45
@santigimeno santigimeno merged commit ba24986 into libuv:v1.x Jun 20, 2024
@panjf2000 panjf2000 deleted the udp-reuseport branch June 20, 2024 22:17
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit to nodejs/node that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
PR-URL: #55403
Refs: libuv/libuv#4419
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit to nodejs/node that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
PR-URL: #55403
Refs: libuv/libuv#4419
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
louwers pushed a commit to louwers/node that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#55403
Refs: libuv/libuv#4419
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
tpoisseau pushed a commit to tpoisseau/node that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#55403
Refs: libuv/libuv#4419
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
ruyadorno pushed a commit to nodejs/node that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2024
PR-URL: #55403
Refs: libuv/libuv#4419
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants