Skip to content

Sync fails if initial state is present in the yjs document #4480

Closed

Description

@max-nextcloud

Describe the bug
If there is some initial state in the yjs document our sync mechanism fails and changes from the user in question are not transferred.

If a yjs session starts with initial data in the document the client will not send updates for that initial data. Normally this is not a problem because the initial Sync message 1 by the other party will cause the client to send it's 'backlog'.

Our sync mechanism blocks yjs queries (Sync Message 1).

It's not clear if this can happen in a real life scenario. Tiptap may take longer to load than yjs takes to initialize and send the initial push message.

To Reproduce

Add this test to cypress/e2e/api/SyncServiceProvider.spec.js:

it('syncs even when initial state was present', function() {
		const sourceMap = this.source.getMap()
		const targetMap = this.target.getMap()
		sourceMap.set('unrelated', 'value')
		cy.intercept({ method: 'POST', url: '**/apps/text/session/push' })
			.as('push')
		cy.intercept({ method: 'POST', url: '**/apps/text/session/sync' })
			.as('sync')
		cy.wait('@push')
		cy.then(() => {
			sourceMap.set('keyA', 'valueA')
			expect(targetMap.get('keyB')).to.be.eq(undefined)
		})
		cy.wait('@sync')
		cy.wait('@sync')
		// eslint-disable-next-line cypress/no-unnecessary-waiting
		cy.wait(1000)
		cy.then(() => {
			expect(targetMap.get('keyA')).to.be.eq('valueA')
		})
	})

See it fail.

Activity

  1. moved this to 🧭 Planning evaluation (don't pick) in 📝 Productivity teamon Jul 12, 2023
  2. juliusknorr commented on Jan 25, 2024

    @juliusknorr
    Member

    @max-nextcloud Sounds a bit like your recent fix addressed this, but not sure if the test case is still applicable?

  3. max-nextcloud commented on Jan 25, 2024

    @max-nextcloud
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Uh... interesting. Had forgotten about this one. It's probably still failing as my fix only applies after some document state has been saved. But it could (and probably should) be expended to also address this one. Nice to know there's already a test for this. It should still work. Will add it to my todo list.

  4. mejo- commented on Mar 20, 2024

    @mejo-
    Member

    @max-nextcloud should we close this for now, given that we did quite a bit of refactoring of create/sync/push? Or would you like to keep it open?

  5. removed their assignment
    on Mar 18, 2025
  6. max-nextcloud commented on Oct 7, 2025

    @max-nextcloud
    CollaboratorAuthor

    6613cf6 fixed this. I'm working on adding the test to the test suite and make it run more reliable. Afterwards I'll close this.

  7. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 13, 2025
  8. mejo- commented on Oct 15, 2025

    @mejo-
    Member

    Pr #4480 will add the missing test.

  9. moved this from 🧭 Planning evaluation (don't pick) to ☑️ Done in 📝 Productivity teamon Oct 15, 2025
  10. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 15, 2025
  11. added a commit that references this issue on May 16, 2026
  12. added a commit that references this issue on May 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions