Skip to content

Backport ABC to 2.6 #45367

Closed
Closed

Description

@baranguren
BPO 1026
Nosy @gvanrossum
Files
  • pyABC_backport_to_2_6.patch
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/gvanrossum'
    closed_at = <Date 2007-09-10.22:37:17.189>
    created_at = <Date 2007-08-26.17:21:23.237>
    labels = ['library']
    title = 'Backport ABC to 2.6'
    updated_at = <Date 2007-10-05.06:04:31.944>
    user = 'https://bugs.python.org/baranguren'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2007-10-05.06:04:31.944>
    actor = 'baranguren'
    assignee = 'gvanrossum'
    closed = True
    closed_date = <Date 2007-09-10.22:37:17.189>
    closer = 'gvanrossum'
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2007-08-26.17:21:23.237>
    creator = 'baranguren'
    dependencies = []
    files = ['8321']
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 1026
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 4.0
    messages = ['55308', '55808', '55816', '56233']
    nosy_count = 2.0
    nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'baranguren']
    pr_nums = []
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = 'accepted'
    stage = None
    status = 'closed'
    superseder = None
    type = None
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1026'
    versions = ['Python 2.6']

    Activity

    1. baranguren commented on Aug 26, 2007

      barangurenmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Worked with Alex Martelli at the Google Python Sprint to backport ABC to
      2.6.

      Added abc.py and test_abc.py to svn trunk.

    2. added
      stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
      on Aug 26, 2007
    3. gvanrossum commented on Sep 10, 2007

      @gvanrossum
      Member

      Committed revision 58099.
      (I had to backport test_typechecks.py myself, and fix one issue in abc.py.)

      Are you going to backport _abcoll.py and its tests?

    4. self-assigned this
      on Sep 10, 2007
    5. baranguren commented on Sep 11, 2007

      barangurenmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Yes. I plan to work on it this weekend. I hope that's okay.

      On 9/10/07, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

      Guido van Rossum added the comment:

      Committed revision 58099.
      (I had to backport test_typechecks.py myself, and fix one issue in abc.py.)

      Are you going to backport _abcoll.py and its tests?

      ----------
      assignee: -> gvanrossum
      nosy: +gvanrossum
      resolution: -> accepted
      status: open -> closed


      Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
      <http://bugs.python.org/issue1026\>


    6. baranguren commented on Oct 5, 2007

      barangurenmannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Hi Guido,

      I just wanted to let you know that I have completed porting _abcoll.py
      but ran into other test failures after running testall.
      The following tests failed:
      test_class test_compile test_descr test_dict test_nis test_richcmp
      test_shelve test_userdict test_weakref

      Also since there are no bytes in 2.6, is it correct to replace bytes
      with str? This is in _abcoll.py.

      Thanks,
      Ben A.

      On 9/10/07, Benjamin Aranguren <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

      Benjamin Aranguren added the comment:

      Yes. I plan to work on it this weekend. I hope that's okay.

      On 9/10/07, Guido van Rossum <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
      >
      > Guido van Rossum added the comment:
      >
      > Committed revision 58099.
      > (I had to backport test_typechecks.py myself, and fix one issue in abc.py.)
      >
      > Are you going to backport _abcoll.py and its tests?
      >
      > ----------
      > assignee: -> gvanrossum
      > nosy: +gvanrossum
      > resolution: -> accepted
      > status: open -> closed
      >
      > __________________________________
      > Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
      > <http://bugs.python.org/issue1026\>
      > __________________________________
      >


      Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
      <http://bugs.python.org/issue1026\>


    7. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions