compileall: option to hardlink duplicate optimization levels bytecode cache files

@brettcannon

BPO	40495
Nosy	@brettcannon, @vstinner, @tiran, @hroncok, @frenzymadness, @FFY00, @hauntsaninja
PRs	bpo-40495: compileall option to hardlink duplicate pyc files #19901 bpo-40445: Update compileall.compile_dir docs #19806

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2020-05-14.14:18:29.412>
created_at = <Date 2020-05-04.09:08:41.735>
labels = ['type-feature', 'library', '3.9']
title = 'compileall: option to hardlink duplicate optimization levels bytecode cache files'
updated_at = <Date 2020-05-15.21:11:33.681>
user = 'https://github.com/frenzymadness'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2020-05-15.21:11:33.681>
actor = 'hauntsaninja'
assignee = 'none'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2020-05-14.14:18:29.412>
closer = 'vstinner'
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2020-05-04.09:08:41.735>
creator = 'frenzy'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 40495
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 11.0
messages = ['368022', '368023', '368024', '368025', '368627', '368628', '368629', '368630', '368631', '368841', '368842']
nosy_count = 7.0
nosy_names = ['brett.cannon', 'vstinner', 'christian.heimes', 'hroncok', 'frenzy', 'FFY00', 'hauntsaninja']
pr_nums = ['19901', '19806']
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue40495'
versions = ['Python 3.9']

We would like to include a possibility of hardlink deduplication of identical pyc files to compileall module in Python 3.9. We've discussed the change [0] and tested it in Fedora RPM build system via implementation in the compileall2 module [1].

The discussion [0] contains a lot of details so I mention here only the key features:

the deduplication can be enabled only if multiple optimization levels are processed at once
it generates a pyc file (optimization level 0) as usual but if it finds that optimized files (optimization levels 1 and 2) have the same content, it uses hardlinks (os.link) to prevents duplicates
the deduplication is disabled by default

We believe that this might be handy for more Pythonistas. In our case, this functionality lowers the installation size of Python 3.9 from 125 MiB to 103 MiB.

[0] https://discuss.python.org/t/compileall-option-to-hardlink-duplicate-optimization-levels-bytecode-cache-files/3014
[1] https://github.com/fedora-python/compileall2

Python's import system is fully compatible with this approach.

importlib never directly writes to a .pyc file. Instead it always creates a new temporary file next to the .pyc file and then overrides the .pyc file with an atomic file system operation. See _write_atomic() in Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py.

compileall and py_compile also use _write_atomic().

Brett, FYI

I forgot to mention that I am working on PR which should be ready soon because the implementation is already done and tested in compileall2.

Is it possible that the PYC file of optimization level 0 content is modified if the PY file content changed, with would make PYC files or optimization level 1 and 2 inconsistent?

Christian Heimes:

Python's import system is fully compatible with this approach. importlib never directly writes to a .pyc file. Instead it always creates a new temporary file next to the .pyc file and then overrides the .pyc file with an atomic file system operation. See _write_atomic() in Lib/importlib/_bootstrap_external.py.

It seems like importlib doesn't have the issue because it doesn't open PYC file to write its content, but _write_atomic() creates a *new* file and then call os.replace() to rename the temporary file to the PYC final name.

Alright, I think that I understood :-)

--

PYC file became more complicated with PEP-552. Here are my own notes to try to understand how it's supposed to be used.

Python 3.9 now has _imp.check_hash_based_pycs string which can be overriden by --check-hash-based-pycs command line option. It can have 3 values:

"always"
"never"
"default"

These values are defined by the PEP-552:

"never" causes the interpreter to always assume hash-based pycs are valid
"default" means the check_source flag in hash-based pycs determines invalidation
"always" causes the interpreter to hash the source file for invalidation regardless of value of check_source bit

When a PYC file is created, it has a "check_source" bit:

Bit set: If the check_source flag is set, Python will determine the validity of the pyc by hashing the source file and comparing the hash with the expected hash in the pyc. If the pyc needs to be regenerated, it will be regenerated as a hash-based pyc again with the check_source flag set.
Bit unset, Python will simply load the pyc without checking the hash of the source file. The expectation in this case is that some external system (e.g., the local Linux distribution’s package manager) is responsible for keeping pycs up to date, so Python itself doesn’t have to check.

I mostly copied/pasted the PEP-552 :-)

py_compile and compileall have a new invalidation_mode which can have 3 values:

class PycInvalidationMode(Enum):
    TIMESTAMP
    CHECKED_HASH
    UNCHECKED_HASH

The default is compiled in py_compile by:

def _get_default_invalidation_mode():
    if os.environ.get('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH'):
        return PycInvalidationMode.CHECKED_HASH
    else:
        return PycInvalidationMode.TIMESTAMP

importlib: SourceLoader.get_code(filename) uses:

    flags = _classify_pyc(data, fullname, exc_details)
    bytes_data = memoryview(data)[16:]
    hash_based = flags & 0b1 != 0
    if hash_based:
        check_source = flags & 0b10 != 0
        if (_imp.check_hash_based_pycs != 'never' and
            (check_source or
             _imp.check_hash_based_pycs == 'always')):
            source_bytes = self.get_data(source_path)
            source_hash = _imp.source_hash(
                _RAW_MAGIC_NUMBER,
                source_bytes,
            )
            _validate_hash_pyc(data, source_hash, fullname,
                               exc_details)
    else:
        _validate_timestamp_pyc(
            data,
            source_mtime,
            st['size'],
            fullname,
            exc_details,
        )

Is it possible that the PYC file of optimization level 0 content is modified if the PY file content changed, with would make PYC files or optimization level 1 and 2 inconsistent? ...

Note that there is a test exactly for this, in case the implementation is changed in the future.

While reviewing PR 19901, I was confused by py_compile and compileall documentation which is outdated: it doesn't mention that optimize argument can be a list of integers.

https://docs.python.org/dev/library/py_compile.html#py_compile.compile
"optimize controls the optimization level and is passed to the built-in compile() function. The default of -1 selects the optimization level of the current interpreter."

https://docs.python.org/dev/library/compileall.html#compileall.compile_dir
"optimize specifies the optimization level for the compiler. It is passed to the built-in compile() function."

Currently, it's possible to implement this optimization using the Unix command "hardlink". Example:

hardlink -c -v /usr/lib64/python3.8/__pycache__/*.pyc

On my Fedora 32, this command says:

Directories: 1
Objects: 520
Regular files: 519
Comparisons: 133
Linked: 133
Saved: 2220032

For example, string.cpython-38.pyc and string.cpython-38.opt-1.pyc become hard links.

Currently, it's possible to implement this optimization using the Unix command "hardlink".

PR 19901 avoids the dependency on external "hardlink" command.

In practice, PR 19901 only impacts newly written PYC files, whereas using manually the "hardlink" command cannot track which files are not or not. "hardlink" command is less practice, PR 19901 avoids modifying PYC files that we don't "own".

New changeset e77d428 by Lumír 'Frenzy' Balhar in branch 'master':
bpo-40495: compileall option to hardlink duplicate pyc files (GH-19901)
e77d428

Thanks Lumír and Miro! I close the issue.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

compileall: option to hardlink duplicate optimization levels bytecode cache files #84675

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

compileall: option to hardlink duplicate optimization levels bytecode cache files #84675

Description

Activity

frenzymadness commented on May 4, 2020

tiran commented on May 4, 2020

tiran commented on May 4, 2020

frenzymadness commented on May 4, 2020

vstinner commented on May 11, 2020

hroncok commented on May 11, 2020

vstinner commented on May 11, 2020

vstinner commented on May 11, 2020

vstinner commented on May 11, 2020

vstinner commented on May 14, 2020

vstinner commented on May 14, 2020

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions