[experiment] slice::IterRaw - #158917
[experiment] slice::IterRaw#158917WaffleLapkin wants to merge 9 commits into
slice::IterRaw#158917Conversation
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test for 4213105 failed: CI. Failed job:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (f65824f): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf. Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 2.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 1.3%, secondary 3.6%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (primary 0.8%, secondary 0.9%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 487.206s -> 489.175s (0.40%) |
7d846be to
f951a20
Compare
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)Important For more information how to resolve CI failures of this job, visit this link. |
No description provided.