Skip to content

perf: Avoid freshening the same predicate twice per selection - #160484

Draft
xmakro wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
xmakro:perf/selection-single-freshen
Draft

xmakro wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
xmakro:perf/selection-single-freshen

Conversation

@xmakro

@xmakro xmakro commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

candidate_from_obligation freshens a predicate that push_stack already freshened. The two results can only differ if the predicate contains type or const inference variables. If it has none, we reuse stack.fresh_trait_pred and skip the second freshening.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 4, 2026
@Kobzol

Kobzol commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 4, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
perf: Avoid freshening the same predicate twice per selection
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: e0160e1 (e0160e1f3fe1659f4d274a0552c202f82c5d2d01)
Base parent: c9ff496 (c9ff496891c278ad660bc0ab85c1f0b72059464a)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e0160e1): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never rustc-perf
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 14
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.2% [-3.4%, -0.2%] 22
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.3% [-0.4%, -0.2%] 14

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.6%, secondary -0.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.3% [2.3%, 2.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.6% [-0.6%, -0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.6% [-0.7%, -0.4%] 10
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.6% [-0.6%, -0.6%] 1

Cycles

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary 7.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.0% [0.5%, 2.3%] 10
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
8.7% [0.4%, 20.1%] 18
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.2% [-6.6%, -0.6%] 3
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.0% [-2.9%, -0.6%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.0% [-6.6%, 2.3%] 13

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 489.838s -> 489.173s (-0.14%)
Artifact size: 390.28 MiB -> 390.28 MiB (0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Aug 4, 2026

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants