eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 10:32pm on 2004-01-02

While copying current balances and outstanding items to this year's spreadsheet, I got distracted poking at the spreadsheet where I recorded almost everything I spent over the course of 2003 (minus several weeks where a power failure and disk errors took out a chunk of data) ... not doing a proper analysis right now, just looking for interesting tidbits and wishing Microsoft Excel had an SQL interface.

I see that I spent (have records of having spent) $306 on music in 2003, not counting travel to/from rehearsals and gigs, meals on the road, etc.

  • Blank cassettes: $5.91
  • Batteries: $15.71
  • Nails: $99.06 ($6.06 for Crazy Glue, the rest for nail salons and parking meters in front of nail salons)
  • Strings: $51.91
  • Stage Costume (socks to wear with my kilt, shoes to wear with kilt or tunic): $73.48
  • Guitar pickup: $40.00
  • WAMA membership: $20.00
That all adds up to about one and a half "serious" gigs worth of income (I had gigs in 2003 paying as little as $5 and as much as $375). Unfortunately I don't have complete information about mileage driven to rehearsals and gigs, so I can't factor in the gasoline (and the right portion of car maintenance and insurance). I should get several years use out of that pickup (the one it replaced lasted quite a while) and at least a few years out of the socks and shoes. But everything else is probably going to cost about as much in the coming year.

Then again, between gasoline, insurance, parts, and associated costs, my car (the no-longer-freeway-worthy Toyota I'm getting rid of to make way for my uncle's Honda) cost me $2572 in 2003 -- half of that in insurance and a sixth of it in gasoline. Knowing how much of that should be assigned to the music category would be a good thing. Especially since the really BIG problem of not having a car at all is not being able to get to rehearsals and performances. If I weren't doing the music, doing without a car would mostly be a gross inconvenience rather than a crisis. I can walk to grocery stores nearby when I'm feeling well. So it takes about twelve "real paying" gigs to cover the cost of my car plus everything in the preceeding paragraph. I was a little short of that in 2003. (I had more than twelve performances (and one photo gig), but not enough of the performances were in the "real pay" category.)

More gigs would give me break-even on the car, but still leave me behind on food and drugs and stuff. Music isn't going to make me rich. But since the alternative is to stop playing because it's not cost effective (on account of requiring a car), and that option is no good because I am a musician, obviously I need more gigs.

Let's see what else leaps out at me ... $53 worth of clothing other than specifically performing attire (though much of that was opaque tights, which I wear when I perform in medieval or renaissance garb, as well as mundanely). I need to lose weight so I can wear more of the clothes that I haven't worn out recently. No wonder a couple of people have complained that I'm not dressing as stylishly as I used to. $1275 in food, or about a hundred bucks a month, which sounds like a lot -- mostly groceries, very little in restaurants, and I got a lot of help with the groceries that doesn't show up in the spreadsheet. Hmm ... three and a half bucks a day for food. Suddenly it doesn't sound like very much after all, and the idea of skimping on groceries to get some film developed no longer looks like such a clever idea. $2510 on my health, much of which was HMO premiums ($300/month) before I lost my coverage for not being able to keep paying, and prescriptions which I stopped being able to refill when I lost my coverage, but there's some OTC stuff in there as well. $54 for miscellaneous house stuff (light bulbs, rock salt for the sidewalk, things like that -- Mom paid for the roof and painting). $228 under "misc.", which includes toilet paper, stamps, my SCA membership, laundry detergent, PayPal transaction fees, etc. $4000 on phone, ISP, gas, electricity, heating oil, and water/sewer, not counting the $450 or so I still owe for the last tank of heating oil at the end of last winter (which I burned 3/4 of in December). The prepaid cell phone is costing me more than a second landline would cost -- about as much as a reasonably small conventional cellular plan -- but has the advantage that when I can't pay it I just do without my phone, instead of racking up more debt and having yet another creditor sending me nastygrams. (And the disadvantage that folks get really annoyed at not being able to reach me.)

That's not everything, but it's most of it. Enough to be pretty darned scary. Especially when I try to figure out where I can cut back.

The vast majority of my income was gifts and loans from my mother, followed by a much smaller amount from performing, and then at some distance what I earned doing computers and photography, and gifts from folks other than Mom. All together, even with all the help from Mom and my friends, ends don't meet. It's scary to be spending $4.50/month on clothing, $3.50/day on food, nothing on rent, and next to nothing on entertainment, and still be living beyond my means.

Here's hoping I can do better in 2004. I think I need more gigs, both as a musician and as a photographer. (And to figure out how to make money from my art photos.) That's not all I need to do, I know. I've got some hurdles to get past regarding dealing with bureaucracy, too. And my general difficulties with accepting help (which I've gotten somewhat better at -- I've at least learned to say yes when offered food) and asking for help (which I've not gotten any better at).

The big missed opportunity of 2003: the photo exhibit that was supposed to happen in September but didn't because I couldn't afford to get large prints made (and matted/framed) for it. I don't know for sure that the show would've generated any sales, but the art director who liked my work said photo exhibits did well in that space, it only would have taken a couple of sales to pay for the cost of mounting the show, and with any luck the exposure would've led to shooting gigs and more shows. But I was never able to pull together the money to assemble the show. (Sort of like a exothermic reaction that never starts because the activation energy is never supplied.)

There are 8 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] butterfluff.livejournal.com at 08:34pm on 2004-01-02
Your SCA membership. If you don't pay it, you pay $20 more at Pennsic, if I recall correctly. So how much is the membership?

What else do you need it for? TI? You have to pay extra for that now, anyway. The event schedule is online.

Check it out. It might not be much, it might save you $15 or more.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:02am on 2004-01-03
You're right, membership is $35, so dropping it would save me $15/year. Enough to get my nails done two and a half times, or to stock up on frozen pizzas when they go on sale.

I feel bad enough about not being able to pay both SCA and Markland dues; I'll feel lame for paying neither. But it comes down to whether it's really fifteen dollars worth of angst. Probably not.
 
posted by [identity profile] donnad.livejournal.com at 05:56am on 2004-01-03
If you need Mats cut for photographs, I can do that. I have a large quantity of mat board in a variety of colors and the appropriate tools to do it. I would just need to see the photos or have you give me some idea of what color mat you wanted and the size of the photo and the size of the mat. (Usually a mat would be about 1.5 - 2 inches larger than the photo.) But cutting mats is a no-brainer for me.

I learned to cut mats for myself a couple years ago when I went to have one cut and they wanted $40 for a double mat, $22. for a single. Sheesh, I spent $5. on a huge piece of mat board and went at it. I still have more than half that piece of mat board left.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:10am on 2004-01-03
Oooh! When I can afford the prints, I'll take you up on the mat cutting -- thank you! (Even better if I can get up there to have you teach me how to do it without making a mess of the materials -- it doesn't look complicated, but I worry about slips in the corners; and the existence of classes to teach it suggests that there are details I haven't thought of.)

When I was thinking of trying to cut my own, I remember the uncut mat board being more expensive than that down here. Maybe I was looking in the wrong stores?
 
posted by [identity profile] donnad.livejournal.com at 02:20pm on 2004-01-03
You do need the appropriate angle cutter, basically its a tool that holds the blade at the correct angle to give you the nice beveled edge. But they can be purchased (but are a bit expensive, but I suppose that it pays for itself in the long run) at most craft stores. I get my mat board at AC Moore crafts and at the local artist supply place in Cambridge (Pearl Arts and Crafts.) AC Moore is much less expensive but doesn't have the variety that Pearl has.

Anytime you want any cut or want to learn...
 
posted by [identity profile] malada.livejournal.com at 07:13am on 2004-01-03
Ninety-nine dollars for *nails*?

Girlfriend, learn to do your own!

I just clip mine.

Okay, okay, once I got bloody red toe nails but the nail polish was a dollar.

-m
 
posted by [identity profile] butterfluff.livejournal.com at 07:45am on 2004-01-03
Clipping isn't quite an option -- they're home-grown guitar picks, and not having them would radically change how he plays guitar and other things.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:45am on 2004-01-03
I clip my fretting hand (except for the thumb -- that's my built-in box-cutter (don't tell the FAA)). And I shape two nails on my picking/strumming hand myself. But when I have the pros put the acrylic on the three guitar picks that take the most wear (middle, ring, and thumb), it takes less time, is smoother, and lasts a lot longer. I do re-shape the tip edges when they get worn, glue the back edges back down when I go too long between salon visits and they grow out to far, etc.

Note that in a busy weekend I can play right through the acrylic and expose actual nail underneath at the tips. I hit way harder for Scottish than I do for filk, folk, early music, or rock. Even one gig is enough to change the geometry of the surface for the last quarter of the length of the nail.

That $90 at salons is $6/visit. (Getting all ten done would, of course, cost more.)

Even so, I do want to learn to do my own, and get the apropriate tools (the little motorized tool they use seems to have better torque/speed characteristics for nails than my Dremmel does; at the very least I need a set of the right bits), and find out how their chemistry differs from what I'd been trying on my own (and still use for emergency repairs). I wonder how much practice I'll need once I assemble the tools and clues.

When I go to a salon I haven't been to before, they're always confused by my not wanting polish at the end. Actually, I'd love to have polish on my nails, but the first time I pick up a guitar, the polish will come off in a V down the center of each nail on my right hand. Someday when I have time and patience, I plan to paint my nails with many alternating layers of red and blue polish -- Sally Hansen Hard As Nails and European Secret Never Chip, which sortakinda stand up to the guitar for a little while in combination (but neither alone) if I let them fully cure between coats -- so that when I play the wear pattern will show concentric bands of strata like a contour map. :-) That'll be cute, but will take a long time to set up. And eventually even that will wear all the way through.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31