eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:25am on 2004-07-20

"The great thing about the United States, I believe, is that you don't have to have a license to be a journalist." -- National Rifle Association Executive Vice President and CEO Wayne LaPierre, Jr., ACLU Membership Conference, 2004-07-08. (high bandwidth RealMedia), (other versions) Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] cos for pointing out the webcast.

There are 8 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com at 02:43pm on 2004-07-20
Or at least maybe they should have to sit a board of exams and get a professional designation before they can take up reportage. If it'd get rid of the John Markoffs, Jack Kelleys, Judith Millers, Mickey Kauses and Jayson Blairs of the world, it might be a good thing.

Hey, they do it with Professional Engineers here, on the grounds that if engineers make mistakes, people die. And as we've all seen, when the media makes mistakes (ie. hyping George and Dick's Excellent Adventure), people die too.

Of course, that's just me being cynical and contrarian.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 07:36pm on 2004-07-20
I'd wondered whether anyone was going to stake out that position. It's an interesting point. (But I feel safer with the lack of control, for all its problems.)
 
posted by [identity profile] juuro.livejournal.com at 01:55pm on 2004-07-21
Of course, if one _is_ a _foreign_ journalist, then there is a special, lengthy, and tortuous accreditation process to be let into the United States.

Reminds me of some other country that used to be.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 02:07pm on 2004-07-21
Doh! Yes, you're right. A relatively recent law, which it seems many foreign journalists are unaware of (meaning they get taken by surprise when arrested for being in violation of it) and AFAICT nearly all Americans are unaware of.

Definitely an ominous thing. :-(
 
posted by [identity profile] juuro.livejournal.com at 02:12pm on 2004-07-21
"Freedom of expression", of course, only is applicable to trustworthy persons.
 
posted by [identity profile] vvalkyri.livejournal.com at 03:41pm on 2004-07-21
Further info?
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 04:22pm on 2004-07-21
Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1231089,00.html) -- "'Believe me, we have treated you with much more respect than other people. You should go to places like Iran, you'd see a big difference.' The irony is that it is only 'countries like Iran' (for example, Cuba, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe) that have a visa requirement for journalists. It is unheard of in open societies, and, in spite of now being enforced in the US, is still so obscure that most journalists are not familiar with it."


KCAL
(http://kcal9.com/california/CA--DeportedJournalis-kn/resources_news_html) -- "Revival of the I-visa requirement has not been properly publicized and numerous reporters are being caught unaware, with at least 15 journalists being deported at LAX alone since March 2003."

Reporters Without Borders (http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=10296)

American Society of Newspaper Editors (http://www.asne.org/index.cfm?ID=5241) -- "The U.S. government has moved part of the way toward a reasonable policy regarding visas for foreign journalists." [...] "U.S. Customs and Border Protection chiefs have now been granted 'discretionary authority' to allow journalists in on a one-time basis."

Reason (http://reason.com/links/links052003.shtml) -- "Their offense? Trying to enter the U.S. the same way European journalists have been coming for the last 17 years"

U.S. Embassy in London (http://www.usembassy.org.uk/cons_web/visa/niv/media.htm) -- "Important: Please note that freelance journalists will only be considered for the 'I' visa classification if they are under contract to a media organization."

International Herald Tribune (http://www.iht.com/articles/529086.htm) -- "'We are an open society,' Bonner declared, 'and we want people to feel welcome here.' This claim could be disputed by American businesses, which have lost $30.7 billion in the last two years because of visa delays and denials for their foreign partners and employees, according to a survey sponsored by eight business organizations." Also, "We don't want to let you in, we don't think you should come in. But you have powerful allies and we don't like the publicity."

Los Angeles Times (http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/showcase/la-ed-visa15jul15.story) -- "Why should journalists be more heavily restricted than tourists in a nation that purports to honor freedom of the press?"

Slate (http://slate.msn.com/id/2100403/)

The Christian Science Monitor (http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0608/dailyUpdate.html) -- "In each of these cases, the journalists had no right to see a lawyer, no right to call their local consulate, and no right to appeal (these rules come courtesy of antiterrorism measures passed in 1996 and 2001). And the growing international outcry seems only to embolden the Immigration and Customs agents who are keeping the United States safe from celebrity hacks and technology journalists."
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 04:35pm on 2004-07-21
I was wrong, BTW, about it being a recent law; it's just that it's been unenforced until recently and had some new provisions added to it. Apparently it has its roots in the McCarthy era, as a tool to regulate "subversives".

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31