forthwritten: glowing sonic screwdriver from Doctor Who.  Text: "Alien tech" with an arrow pointing to the sonic screwdriver  (alien tech)
forthwritten ([personal profile] forthwritten) wrote2009-03-06 11:19 am

on privacy and pseudonyms and identities

I've been thinking about this quite a lot recently. I started my LJ when I was 17 and, as teenagers are wont to be, a bit naive and ignorant. Luckily I veered towards the extremely private end of naive rather than the "my dirty laundry, let me show you it" end, but I still managed my privacy in a way that now makes me feel uncomfortable.

This thing is that LJ-like sites are difficult in terms of identity and privacy. On one hand, I want to have conversations with sensible, intelligent people which makes a level of privacy appealing - a way of excluding those who aren't interested in or will disrupt such conversations. On the other, I want to attract the sort of people who can have those kinds of conversation, and locking down most of my content is not a good way to go about that. It means I have to go "hi, you're cool, I'm adding you" and I'm actually a shy person who hates making the first move.

Dreamwidth changes the terms of those interactions; I can subscribe to people without having to let them see my locked content, but at the same time, if I manage my content in the same way as I do on LJ, there won't be much unlocked content that people who subscribe to me but to whom I haven't given access will be able to see.

I have an over-elaborate system of filters on LJ, but one of the things I've come to realise is that there's a dynamic to these. Giving someone access to locked content subtly changes the ecosystem that is my journal - the presence of a new person means that there might be things I'm less comfortable talking about. With filters, I initially set them up in terms of how comfortable I felt with people - an inner circle and an outer circle, to name two - but I realised that I was using the outer circle filter to discuss things like anti-racism, feminism and queerness. So I started calling it my sensible people filter and started adding the people I didn't know well, but had interacted with during debates and discussion. Unfortunately, this means that they also have access to some personal stuff to which I'm not entirely sure I want them to have access. It's all a bit late in the day to reorganise it.

I will be separating access filters into privacy and content filters (again - I did once have a university filter and so on but then I realised that most of my writing was about university and so the filter was a bit pointless) but I'm not sure how to manage public and private identities. How do other people manage this?

Okay, I go now to gatecrash a lecture and then read some critical discourse analysis.
juliet: My rat Ash, at 6 wks old, climbing up the baby-rat-tank and peering over the edge (ash exploring)

[personal profile] juliet 2009-03-07 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
One of the ways I manage it is by trying not to care too much, basically. On LJ, I work roughly on the following basis:

- leave as much as I am comfortable with unlocked (this has been especially true for the last few months as I've been using LJ for my travel-blog).

- lock anything that references work, or is sufficiently personal, or (in some cases) sufficiently controversial that I don't want the Internets At Large reading it.

- use a (very very small) custom list, of maybe 10 people, for really personal stuff (eg when I was dealing with a painful breakup).

So on LJ, I'll pretty much add anyone who I know in person & don't dislike, *or* who I know online and want to read / think are cool. And I treat a friends-locked post as only very minimally secure, and have a reading list filter to cope with the reading side of things.

*But* this is partly connected with a deliberate decision to be open about my life as much as is possible. (Partly because I think that unless you try *very hard*, privacy on the internets is a bit of an illusion, so I'd rather not rely on it.) And it's not always entirely straightforward.

So I guess the executive summary is that I try to minimise the distinction between my public and private identities, because for me that is less stressful :)

(So far on DW I haven't really added anyone to my Trust list, simply because I haven't made any locked posts yet!)
phoenix: ink-and-watercolour drawing -- girl looking calmly over her shoulder (Default)

[personal profile] phoenix 2009-03-07 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a free-and-easy policy when it comes to giving access to my locked entries, and so far it's been even more so on DW. (I've granted access to and subscribed to a whole bunch of people I don't know, essentially as a gesture of greeting.) This is because I'm really quite happy for strangers to read anything I write, and my real issue is with people from 'real life' finding my journal against my will, so I lock anything identifying. At present no one I know originally from RL is on my friends list; while my sister may know the url, to my knowledge she doesn't read it. As I get to know people better, sometimes my entries embarrass me, and I've occasionally set up anonymous public journals to write in so that *only* strangers can read.
wendelah1: (Default)

[personal profile] wendelah1 2009-04-12 08:38 am (UTC)(link)
Hello, you don't know me. I'm just wandering around looking at what's been posted here so far, trying to decide what, if anything, I'm going to do when accounts are available for purchase.

The issue of privacy and anonymity is an interesting one to me. I am a middle-aged woman who is relatively new to both fandom and the internet. I have three journal identities: one that is flocked, that I use only rarely, and only for work-related posts, another one that is for posting badfic porn, that I created for one of the porn-battles, and one that is for writing fic, for writing about fandom in general and about my non-fandom/regular life. I have links on my main journal to all of the journals, and my regular email address is available to anyone on my flist.

I am most fortunate to have always been able to be open with my friends and family about my fannish interests; my husband has even betaed my fic. My dad, my husband and my son all have access to my journal, although as far as I can tell, only my husband reads it. I rarely flock anything. So, essentially, my public and private identities are the same.

This is not the case for everyone, and I entirely understand why it can't be. I think your policy of giving access to people whom you have come to trust has worked well for you in the past. The disadvantage is that it is hard for people to get to know someone if they never get to read anything personal.