[refactor](multicast) change the way multicast do filter, project and shuffle#21412
Merged
[refactor](multicast) change the way multicast do filter, project and shuffle#21412
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
02685fd to
7a6532e
Compare
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
zhangguoqiang666
approved these changes
Jul 3, 2023
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
7a6532e to
6faa3a6
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
HappenLee
reviewed
Jul 4, 2023
Contributor
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
Contributor
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
xiaokang
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 4, 2023
… shuffle (#21412) Co-authored-by: Jerry Hu <mrhhsg@gmail.com> 1. Filtering is done at the sending end rather than the receiving end 2. Projection is done at the sending end rather than the receiving end 3. Each sender can use different shuffle policies to send data
16 tasks
morrySnow
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2025
…nsumer (#58964) Related PR: #21412 Problem Summary: This pull request improves the handling of distribution properties (specifically "must shuffle") for `PhysicalProject` and `PhysicalFilter` nodes in the query planner, and adds comprehensive unit tests to ensure correctness. The main logic ensures that when certain child nodes require shuffling, the planner correctly adjusts the distribution requirements, especially in the presence of `Project`, `Filter`, and `Limit` nodes. Key changes include: **Distribution Property Handling Enhancements:** * Added logic in `ChildrenPropertiesRegulator` to check if a child node under a `PhysicalProject` or `PhysicalFilter` requires a "must shuffle" distribution, and to adjust the children’s properties accordingly. This is done via the new `mustShuffleUnderProjectOrFilter` method. * Included `PhysicalLimit` in the set of nodes that can trigger a shuffle requirement, by updating imports and logic. **Testing Improvements:** * Added a new test class `ChildrenPropertiesRegulatorTest.java` with detailed unit tests for the handling of "must shuffle" properties under `Project`, `Filter`, and `Limit` nodes. These tests use mocks to simulate various plan trees and assert correct distribution specification propagation. **Regression Test Coverage:** * Added a new regression test in `cte.groovy` to verify correct behavior when multiple `Project` nodes are present on a CTE consumer, ensuring the planner handles such cases as expected. These changes collectively make the planner more robust in handling complex plan trees with respect to distribution requirements, and ensure correctness through thorough testing.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2025
…nsumer (#58964) Related PR: #21412 Problem Summary: This pull request improves the handling of distribution properties (specifically "must shuffle") for `PhysicalProject` and `PhysicalFilter` nodes in the query planner, and adds comprehensive unit tests to ensure correctness. The main logic ensures that when certain child nodes require shuffling, the planner correctly adjusts the distribution requirements, especially in the presence of `Project`, `Filter`, and `Limit` nodes. Key changes include: **Distribution Property Handling Enhancements:** * Added logic in `ChildrenPropertiesRegulator` to check if a child node under a `PhysicalProject` or `PhysicalFilter` requires a "must shuffle" distribution, and to adjust the children’s properties accordingly. This is done via the new `mustShuffleUnderProjectOrFilter` method. * Included `PhysicalLimit` in the set of nodes that can trigger a shuffle requirement, by updating imports and logic. **Testing Improvements:** * Added a new test class `ChildrenPropertiesRegulatorTest.java` with detailed unit tests for the handling of "must shuffle" properties under `Project`, `Filter`, and `Limit` nodes. These tests use mocks to simulate various plan trees and assert correct distribution specification propagation. **Regression Test Coverage:** * Added a new regression test in `cte.groovy` to verify correct behavior when multiple `Project` nodes are present on a CTE consumer, ensuring the planner handles such cases as expected. These changes collectively make the planner more robust in handling complex plan trees with respect to distribution requirements, and ensure correctness through thorough testing.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Co-authored-by: Jerry Hu mrhhsg@gmail.com
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...