[fix](load) fix priority queue order in memtable memory limiter#41278
Merged
liaoxin01 merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom Sep 26, 2024
Merged
[fix](load) fix priority queue order in memtable memory limiter#41278liaoxin01 merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
liaoxin01 merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
Member
Author
|
run buildall |
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
kaijchen
added a commit
to kaijchen/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2024
…he#41278) ## Proposed changes apache#41018 used priority queue when selecting memtables to flush. But the compare function is wrong and causing the order to be the opposite. > Note that the Compare parameter is defined such that it returns true if its first argument comes before its second argument in a weak ordering. But because the priority queue outputs largest elements first, the elements that "come before" are actually output last. That is, the front of the queue contains the "last" element according to the weak ordering imposed by Compare. This PR fixes the compare function to make larger memtables come front.
kaijchen
added a commit
to kaijchen/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
…he#41278) ## Proposed changes apache#41018 used priority queue when selecting memtables to flush. But the compare function is wrong and causing the order to be the opposite. > Note that the Compare parameter is defined such that it returns true if its first argument comes before its second argument in a weak ordering. But because the priority queue outputs largest elements first, the elements that "come before" are actually output last. That is, the front of the queue contains the "last" element according to the weak ordering imposed by Compare. This PR fixes the compare function to make larger memtables come front.
kaijchen
added a commit
to kaijchen/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
…he#41278) ## Proposed changes apache#41018 used priority queue when selecting memtables to flush. But the compare function is wrong and causing the order to be the opposite. > Note that the Compare parameter is defined such that it returns true if its first argument comes before its second argument in a weak ordering. But because the priority queue outputs largest elements first, the elements that "come before" are actually output last. That is, the front of the queue contains the "last" element according to the weak ordering imposed by Compare. This PR fixes the compare function to make larger memtables come front.
kaijchen
added a commit
to kaijchen/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
…he#41278) ## Proposed changes apache#41018 used priority queue when selecting memtables to flush. But the compare function is wrong and causing the order to be the opposite. > Note that the Compare parameter is defined such that it returns true if its first argument comes before its second argument in a weak ordering. But because the priority queue outputs largest elements first, the elements that "come before" are actually output last. That is, the front of the queue contains the "last" element according to the weak ordering imposed by Compare. This PR fixes the compare function to make larger memtables come front.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
#41018 used priority queue when selecting memtables to flush.
But the compare function is wrong and causing the order to be the opposite.
This PR fixes the compare function to make larger memtables come front.