[fix](doris compose) be disable java support#52412

yujun777 · 2025-06-27T04:40:12Z

What problem does this PR solve?

be sometimes hang at libjvm when it start, we don't known why.

so disable be java support. only after we fix the be hang at libjvm, we enable java support again.

Thread 1 (LWP 867 "doris_be"):
#0  0x00007fc6b09087b2 in __pthread_cond_signal_2_0 (cond=0x0) at old_pthread_cond_signal.c:40
#1  0x00007fffab25a2f0 in ?? ()
#2  0x00000000ab25a2f0 in ?? ()
#3  0x00007fc6b1a9436e in WeakHandle::WeakHandle(OopStorage*, oopDesc*) () from /usr/local/openjdk-17/lib/server/libjvm.so
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
[Inferior 1 (process 867) detached]

Check List (For Author)

Test
- Regression test
- Unit Test
- Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
  - This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
  - Previous test can cover this change.
  - No code files have been changed.
  - Other reason
Behavior changed:
- No.
- Yes.
Does this need documentation?
- No.
- Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

Confirm the release note
Confirm test cases
Confirm document
Add branch pick label

Thearas · 2025-06-27T04:40:18Z

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
What features were added. Why was this function added?
Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

yujun777 · 2025-06-27T04:40:22Z

run buildall

deardeng

LGTM

github-actions · 2025-06-27T06:25:14Z

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

yujun777 · 2025-06-27T06:29:25Z

run p0

yujun777 · 2025-06-27T07:22:43Z

run p0

yujun777 · 2025-06-27T09:57:49Z

run p0

yujun777 · 2025-06-30T02:08:40Z

run p0

yujun777 · 2025-06-30T03:35:20Z

run buildall

yujun777 · 2025-06-30T06:16:39Z

run p0

github-actions · 2025-06-30T09:06:54Z

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

### What problem does this PR solve? be sometimes hang at libjvm when it start, we don't known why. so disable be java support. only after we fix the be hang at libjvm, we enable java support again. ``` Thread 1 (LWP 867 "doris_be"): #0 0x00007fc6b09087b2 in __pthread_cond_signal_2_0 (cond=0x0) at old_pthread_cond_signal.c:40 #1 0x00007fffab25a2f0 in ?? () #2 0x00000000ab25a2f0 in ?? () #3 0x00007fc6b1a9436e in WeakHandle::WeakHandle(OopStorage*, oopDesc*) () from /usr/local/openjdk-17/lib/server/libjvm.so Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) [Inferior 1 (process 867) detached] ```

Cherry-picked from #52412 Co-authored-by: yujun <yujun@selectdb.com>

…apache#52524) Cherry-picked from apache#52412 Co-authored-by: yujun <yujun@selectdb.com>

### What problem does this PR solve? be sometimes hang at libjvm when it start, we don't known why. so disable be java support. only after we fix the be hang at libjvm, we enable java support again. ``` Thread 1 (LWP 867 "doris_be"): #0 0x00007fc6b09087b2 in __pthread_cond_signal_2_0 (cond=0x0) at old_pthread_cond_signal.c:40 apache#1 0x00007fffab25a2f0 in ?? () apache#2 0x00000000ab25a2f0 in ?? () apache#3 0x00007fc6b1a9436e in WeakHandle::WeakHandle(OopStorage*, oopDesc*) () from /usr/local/openjdk-17/lib/server/libjvm.so Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) [Inferior 1 (process 867) detached] ```

### What problem does this PR solve? ### Problem after enable java support, be can not start correctly, it will hang on stack: ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f5fb1e97ce6 in __futex_abstimed_wait_common () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007f5fb1e9a798 in pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007f5fb2c98bf3 in os::PlatformEvent::park() () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-17//lib/server/libjvm.so #3 0x00007f5fb2c693a5 in ObjectMonitor::wait(long, bool, JavaThread*) () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-17//lib/server/libjvm.so #4 0x00007f5fb2e8b316 in ObjectSynchronizer::wait(Handle, long, JavaThread*) () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-17//lib/server/libjvm.so #5 0x00007f5fb2934a97 in JVM_MonitorWait () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-17//lib/server/libjvm.so #6 0x00007f5f9de245ba in ?? () #7 0x00007f5f49446158 in ?? () #8 0x00007f5faeb9fa00 in ?? () #9 0x00007ffc37f91178 in ?? () #10 0x00007f5f9de304bd in ?? () #11 0x00007ffc37f910a0 in ?? () #12 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () ``` jstack of be: ``` "main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=0 cpu=931.38ms elapsed=66.08s tid=0x00007fab8e12c400 nid=0x3e68aa in Object.wait() [0x00007ffdb3d4c000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(java.base@17.0.15-ga/Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000000bd183b68> (a java.lang.ProcessImpl) at java.lang.Object.wait(java.base@17.0.15-ga/Object.java:338) at java.lang.ProcessImpl.waitFor(java.base@17.0.15-ga/ProcessImpl.java:434) - locked <0x00000000bd183b68> (a java.lang.ProcessImpl) at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.runCommand(Shell.java:1061) at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.run(Shell.java:957) at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell$ShellCommandExecutor.execute(Shell.java:1282) at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.isSetsidSupported(Shell.java:853) at org.apache.hadoop.util.Shell.<clinit>(Shell.java:838) at org.apache.hadoop.util.StringUtils.<clinit>(StringUtils.java:79) at org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration.getBoolean(Configuration.java:1713) at org.apache.hadoop.security.SecurityUtil.setConfigurationInternal(SecurityUtil.java:103) at org.apache.hadoop.security.SecurityUtil.<clinit>(SecurityUtil.java:92) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.initialize(UserGroupInformation.java:312) - locked <0x00000000bd5fd708> (a java.lang.Class for org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.ensureInitialized(UserGroupInformation.java:300) - locked <0x00000000bd5fd708> (a java.lang.Class for org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation) at org.apache.hadoop.security.UserGroupInformation.getCurrentUser(UserGroupInformation.java:575) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.viewfs.ViewFileSystem.<init>(ViewFileSystem.java:279) at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(java.base@17.0.15-ga/Native Method) at jdk.internal.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(java.base@17.0.15-ga/NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:77) at jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(java.base@17.0.15-ga/DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstanceWithCaller(java.base@17.0.15-ga/Constructor.java:500) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(java.base@17.0.15-ga/Constructor.java:481) at java.util.ServiceLoader$ProviderImpl.newInstance(java.base@17.0.15-ga/ServiceLoader.java:789) at java.util.ServiceLoader$ProviderImpl.get(java.base@17.0.15-ga/ServiceLoader.java:729) at java.util.ServiceLoader$3.next(java.base@17.0.15-ga/ServiceLoader.java:1403) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem.loadFileSystems(FileSystem.java:3534) - locked <0x00000000826529f0> (a java.lang.Class for org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem) ``` This problem comes from: #45287 after this fix, we could enable java support: #52412 ### Another Fix Method Add JAVA_OPTS `-Djdk.lang.processReaperUseDefaultStackSize=true` inside be.conf, also can fix this problem: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8153057 From gemini: ![Clipboard_Screenshot_1751683706](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a54ffb3a-cb57-4f8a-bc85-5366081c2d9b)

deardeng approved these changes Jun 27, 2025

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot added the reviewed label Jun 27, 2025

yujun777 changed the title ~~[fix](doris compose) disable java support~~ [fix](doris compose) be disable java support Jun 27, 2025

disable java support

58d6c38

yujun777 force-pushed the fix-libjvm-hang branch from d06d502 to 58d6c38 Compare June 30, 2025 03:35

englefly approved these changes Jun 30, 2025

View reviewed changes

englefly added dev/3.0.x dev/3.1.x labels Jun 30, 2025

github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jun 30, 2025

englefly merged commit 49b8301 into apache:master Jun 30, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2025

branch-3.0: [fix](doris compose) be disable java support #52412 #52524

Merged

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2025

branch-3.1: [fix](doris compose) be disable java support #52412 #52525

Merged

morrySnow pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2025

branch-3.1: [fix](doris compose) be disable java support #52412 (#52525)

c0ea14b

Cherry-picked from #52412 Co-authored-by: yujun <yujun@selectdb.com>

dataroaring pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025

branch-3.0: [fix](doris compose) be disable java support #52412 (#52524)

0adfc33

Cherry-picked from #52412 Co-authored-by: yujun <yujun@selectdb.com>

dataroaring added dev/3.0.7-merged and removed dev/3.0.x labels Jul 2, 2025

morrySnow added dev/3.1.0-merged and removed dev/3.1.x labels Jul 2, 2025

koarz pushed a commit to koarz/doris that referenced this pull request Jul 3, 2025

branch-3.0: [fix](doris compose) be disable java support apache#52412 (…

caadfb6

…apache#52524) Cherry-picked from apache#52412 Co-authored-by: yujun <yujun@selectdb.com>

cambyzju mentioned this pull request Jul 5, 2025

[fix](be java) be hang while enable_java_support #52818

Merged

16 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[fix](doris compose) be disable java support#52412