Skip to content

Comments

[Chore](clucene) update clucene version to latest#54619

Merged
airborne12 merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
airborne12:update-clucene
Aug 12, 2025
Merged

[Chore](clucene) update clucene version to latest#54619
airborne12 merged 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
airborne12:update-clucene

Conversation

@airborne12
Copy link
Member

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Aug 12, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@airborne12
Copy link
Member Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 59.02% (16614/28149)
Line Coverage 47.91% (150679/314489)
Region Coverage 36.76% (112936/307250)
Branch Coverage 39.67% (50094/126290)

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100% (0/0) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 81.46% (22502/27624)
Line Coverage 74.15% (233194/314492)
Region Coverage 61.43% (193831/315512)
Branch Coverage 65.47% (83701/127838)

Copy link
Member

@eldenmoon eldenmoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@zzzxl1993 zzzxl1993 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 12, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 100% (0/0) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 81.46% (22502/27624)
Line Coverage 74.15% (233194/314492)
Region Coverage 61.43% (193831/315512)
Branch Coverage 65.47% (83701/127838)

@airborne12 airborne12 merged commit e9f7df3 into apache:master Aug 12, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
@airborne12 airborne12 deleted the update-clucene branch August 12, 2025 15:43
airborne12 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
…erted index (#54666)

### What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #54619

Problem Summary:
When no parser is specified, the inverted index writer currently creates
a default analyzer (simple analyzer), which can cause unnecessary
performance overhead. This PR addresses this by setting the analyzer to
nullptr to avoid the overhead.
Note: This PR should be merged together with or after #54619.
airborne12 added a commit to airborne12/apache-doris that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
…erted index (apache#54666)

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: apache#54619

Problem Summary:
When no parser is specified, the inverted index writer currently creates
a default analyzer (simple analyzer), which can cause unnecessary
performance overhead. This PR addresses this by setting the analyzer to
nullptr to avoid the overhead.
Note: This PR should be merged together with or after apache#54619.
airborne12 added a commit to airborne12/apache-doris that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
…erted index (apache#54666)

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: apache#54619

Problem Summary:
When no parser is specified, the inverted index writer currently creates
a default analyzer (simple analyzer), which can cause unnecessary
performance overhead. This PR addresses this by setting the analyzer to
nullptr to avoid the overhead.
Note: This PR should be merged together with or after apache#54619.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/3.1.0-merged reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants