[fix](parquet) incorrect skip files when returning eof

[morningman]

What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:

Introduced from topn optimization.
When opening a parquet reader, all row group may be filtered and the open method will return EOF,
we should handle this kind of return value separately and continue opening other files.
Otherwise, the rest of files may be wrongly skipped and the result is incorrect.

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

• Test

  • Regression test
  • Unit Test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
    • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
    • Previous test can cover this change.
    • No code files have been changed.
    • Other reason

• Behavior changed:

  • No.
  • Yes.

• Does this need documentation?

  • No.
  • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

• Confirm the release note
• Confirm test cases
• Confirm document
• Add branch pick label

[hello-stephen]

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

[morningman]

run buildall

[doris-robot]

ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.72 s

machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
scripts: https://github.com/apache/doris/tree/master/tools/clickbench-tools
ClickBench test result on commit bda69a506da79774ac77a113577bc1771ab45be5, data reload: false

query1	0.06	0.04	0.05
query2	0.09	0.05	0.06
query3	0.25	0.08	0.08
query4	1.61	0.12	0.12
query5	0.27	0.27	0.25
query6	1.20	0.66	0.64
query7	0.04	0.03	0.02
query8	0.06	0.04	0.05
query9	0.63	0.53	0.52
query10	0.59	0.57	0.58
query11	0.19	0.12	0.12
query12	0.16	0.12	0.12
query13	0.64	0.61	0.62
query14	1.02	1.04	1.03
query15	0.85	0.85	0.85
query16	0.42	0.42	0.40
query17	1.08	1.01	1.04
query18	0.22	0.20	0.20
query19	1.97	1.81	1.80
query20	0.02	0.01	0.02
query21	15.56	0.90	0.58
query22	0.75	1.16	0.70
query23	14.90	1.43	0.67
query24	7.10	1.23	0.96
query25	0.53	0.14	0.15
query26	0.61	0.17	0.13
query27	0.07	0.07	0.05
query28	10.07	1.39	0.94
query29	12.55	3.94	3.38
query30	0.30	0.13	0.11
query31	2.82	0.61	0.37
query32	3.23	0.58	0.49
query33	3.17	3.13	3.07
query34	16.14	5.46	4.84
query35	4.92	4.92	4.92
query36	0.70	0.53	0.50
query37	0.11	0.07	0.07
query38	0.07	0.05	0.04
query39	0.04	0.03	0.04
query40	0.17	0.15	0.15
query41	0.08	0.04	0.03
query42	0.03	0.03	0.03
query43	0.04	0.04	0.04
Total cold run time: 105.33 s
Total hot run time: 30.72 s

[doris-robot]

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 50.00% (3/6) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category	Coverage
Function Coverage	52.55% (17819/33910)
Line Coverage	37.75% (161926/428950)
Region Coverage	32.25% (123659/383474)
Branch Coverage	33.61% (54224/161316)

[hello-stephen]

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 50.00% (3/6) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category	Coverage
Function Coverage	71.21% (23678/33249)
Line Coverage	57.64% (247117/428708)
Region Coverage	52.76% (204940/388438)
Branch Coverage	54.56% (88506/162211)

[hubgeter]

LGTM

[github-actions]

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

[github-actions]

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

[kaka11chen]

LGTM