Skip to content

Conversation

@tjgq
Copy link
Contributor

@tjgq tjgq commented Feb 18, 2025

Both present the same kind of security risk. I don't see a strong reason to introduce a separate field instead of renaming and reusing the existing one.

Both present the same kind of security risk. I don't see a strong reason to
introduce a separate field instead of renaming and reusing the existing one.
@fweikert fweikert merged commit cdb99bf into bazelbuild:master Feb 19, 2025
2 checks passed
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

BAZELISK_HOME

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants