feat: [#334] Supports use ctx.Request().Bind after ctx.Request.Validate

[almas-x]

📑 Description

Closes goravel/goravel#334

✅ Checks

• Added test cases for my code

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR enables request body reuse after validation by configuring the validation library to restore the request body. This addresses issue #334 where ctx.Request().Bind() could not be used after ctx.Request().Validate() because the request body was consumed during validation.

• Adds RestoreRequestBody: true configuration to the global validation options

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.29%. Comparing base (b41556f) to head (9713b06).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1190   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.29%   68.29%           
=======================================
  Files         233      233           
  Lines       15071    15072    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        10292    10293    +1     
  Misses       4399     4399           
  Partials      380      380           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50.

Benchmark suite	Current: 9713b06	Previous: b41556f	Ratio
Benchmark_Fatal	4e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op	2e-7 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op	2
Benchmark_Fatal - ns/op	4e-7 ns/op	2e-7 ns/op	2

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

[almas-x]

Should the unit tests for this change be added to the framework repository, or should they be included in the gin/fiber driver repositories instead? @hwbrzzl

[hwbrzzl]

LGTM, we can add the test in goravel/example.

[hwbrzzl]

Good to know this new option. 👍