Skip to content

Conversation

@masesdevelopers
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR updates JNetReflector in many points as described in #178:

NOTE: breaking change for a namespace change due to repo structure refactoring, @masesdevelopers next version shall update Minor version

Related Issue

Closed #178
#137

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Not tested, waiting other issues to be done (e.g. #180)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

…NetBridgeMain, remove keyword from argument names, improved management of generic super-classes, improved management of generics in constructor arguments
… Java interface

masesgroup#137: created the stub methods of the listener interface, first step to introduce auto generated Listeners
… of generic type defined for Iterator and Iterable
…end it

masesgroup#178 (comment): classes with a single interface which isn't a listener inherits from interface implementation class
… an exception type in parameters to have an unified approach between listeners and methods
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers added bug Something isn't working JNet JNet related issue JNetReflector JNetReflector related issue labels Jun 12, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers self-assigned this Jun 12, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers merged commit 43504bd into masesgroup:master Jun 12, 2023
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers deleted the 178-using-jnet-155-some-limits-or-constraints-of-jnetreflector-are-raised branch June 12, 2023 14:51
@masesdevelopers masesdevelopers linked an issue Jun 21, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working JNet JNet related issue JNetReflector JNetReflector related issue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using JNet 1.5.5 some limits or constraints of JNetReflector are raised Write some kind of generics in a better way

1 participant