Skip to content

Conversation

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Closes #92157
r? compiler-errors
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi [email protected]

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jan 14, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 14, 2023

📌 Commit aa51a0f has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 14, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#106072 (fix: misleading "add dyn keyword before derive macro" suggestion)
 - rust-lang#106859 (Suggestion for type mismatch when we need a u8 but the programmer wrote a char literal)
 - rust-lang#106863 (Remove various double spaces in compiler source comments.)
 - rust-lang#106865 (Add explanation comment for GUI test)
 - rust-lang#106867 (Fix the stability attributes for `std::os::fd`.)
 - rust-lang#106878 (Add regression test for rust-lang#92157)
 - rust-lang#106879 (Add regression test for rust-lang#42114)
 - rust-lang#106880 (doc: fix typo)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 08ef0ce into rust-lang:master Jan 15, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.68.0 milestone Jan 15, 2023
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the issue-92157 branch January 15, 2023 03:07
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)

The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See rust-lang#92157 (comment).

But that's fine since in the latest compiler says:

> note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly

So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See rust-lang#92157 (comment).

r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in rust-lang#106878
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)

The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See rust-lang#92157 (comment).

But that's fine since in the latest compiler says:

> note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly

So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See rust-lang#92157 (comment).

r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in rust-lang#106878
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)

The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See rust-lang#92157 (comment).

But that's fine since in the latest compiler says:

> note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly

So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See rust-lang#92157 (comment).

r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in rust-lang#106878
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Rollup merge of #150821 - remove-test, r=jackh726

tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)

The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See #92157 (comment).

But that's fine since in the latest compiler says:

> note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly

So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See #92157 (comment).

r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in #106878
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed)

The bug the test tests for is masked by the wrong `#[lang = "start"]` signature. If the signature is corrected, the test builds. But that is not because the bug is fixed, but because the test has been changed too much from the original reproducer. The original reproducer still ICE:s. See rust-lang/rust#92157 (comment).

But that's fine since in the latest compiler says:

> note: using internal features is not supported and expected to cause internal compiler errors when used incorrectly

So let's remove the test and close the issue as "won't fix". See rust-lang/rust#92157 (comment).

r? @JohnTitor since you added the test in rust-lang/rust#106878
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

broken MIR in DefId(0:15 ~ nocore[d905]::{impl#0}::add)

4 participants