Add MC/DC support to coverage test tools#123626
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Apr 9, 2024
Merged
Conversation
We don't need the branch coverage version of this test, but we can recycle is to make sure that the MC/DC coverage support works as expected.
Collaborator
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest cc @jieyouxu |
rustbot
added
the
A-code-coverage
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#123254 (Do not allocate for ZST ThinBox (attempt 2 using const_allocate)) - rust-lang#123626 (Add MC/DC support to coverage test tools) - rust-lang#123638 (rustdoc: synthetic auto: filter out clauses from the implementor's ParamEnv) - rust-lang#123653 (Split `non_local_definitions` lint tests in separate test files) - rust-lang#123658 (Stop making any assumption about the projections applied to the upvars in the `ByMoveBody` pass) - rust-lang#123662 (Don't rely on upvars being assigned just because coroutine-closure kind is assigned) - rust-lang#123665 (Fix typo in `Future::poll()` docs) - rust-lang#123672 (compiletest: unset `RUSTC_LOG_COLOR`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#123626 - Zalathar:test-tools-mcdc, r=oli-obk Add MC/DC support to coverage test tools Extracted and squashed from rust-lang#123409 by `@ZhuUx.` These updates to the coverage test tools can land ahead of the main changes, slightly reducing the size and complexity of that PR. --- The `coverage-dump` changes aren't directly tested in this PR, but the tests in rust-lang#123409 demonstrate that they do work on real MC/DC coverage output. `@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Extracted and squashed from #123409 by @ZhuUx.
These updates to the coverage test tools can land ahead of the main changes, slightly reducing the size and complexity of that PR.
The
coverage-dumpchanges aren't directly tested in this PR, but the tests in #123409 demonstrate that they do work on real MC/DC coverage output.@rustbot label +A-code-coverage