search graph: cache provisional results between fixpoint iterations#125167
Closed
lcnr wants to merge 6 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
search graph: cache provisional results between fixpoint iterations#125167lcnr wants to merge 6 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
lcnr wants to merge 6 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred to the core trait solver cc @rust-lang/initiative-trait-system-refactor |
This was referenced May 19, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…rors track cycle participants per root The search graph may have multiple roots, e.g. in ``` A :- B B :- A, C C :- D D :- C ``` we first encounter the `A -> B -> A` cycle which causes `A` to be a root. We then later encounter the `C -> D -> C` cycle as a nested goal of `B`. This cycle is completely separate and `C` will get moved to the global cache. This previously caused us to use `[B, D]` as the `cycle_participants` for `C` and `[]` for `A`. split off from rust-lang#125167 as I would like to merge this change separately and will rebase that PR on top of this one. There is no test for this issue and I don't quite know how to write one. It is probably worth it to generalize the search graph to enable us to write unit tests for it. r? `@compiler-errors`
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125308 - lcnr:search-graph-5, r=compiler-errors track cycle participants per root The search graph may have multiple roots, e.g. in ``` A :- B B :- A, C C :- D D :- C ``` we first encounter the `A -> B -> A` cycle which causes `A` to be a root. We then later encounter the `C -> D -> C` cycle as a nested goal of `B`. This cycle is completely separate and `C` will get moved to the global cache. This previously caused us to use `[B, D]` as the `cycle_participants` for `C` and `[]` for `A`. split off from rust-lang#125167 as I would like to merge this change separately and will rebase that PR on top of this one. There is no test for this issue and I don't quite know how to write one. It is probably worth it to generalize the search graph to enable us to write unit tests for it. r? `@compiler-errors`
Contributor
Author
|
closing this for now, rewrote this PR in a separate branch and am still not convinced it is sound. Will require some further thought until anything's ready to land here |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
will still go through it once to add some comments and to explain the general idea somewhere before merging this.
r? @nikomatsakis @compiler-errors